ENVIRONMENT & ENERGY DAILY (partial)
Tuesday, July 19, 2005
SPOTLIGHT
1. ENERGY POLICY
Energy conference strikes middleground on clean coal power funding
Mary O'Driscoll, E&E Daily senior reporter
The House-Senate energy conference appears to have split its differences
over clean coal power technology funding, according to a draft proposal
to be considered today when the committee starts marking up the
conference report.
The draft language for the coal title of the energy bill calls for 70
percent of the proposed $1.8 billion Clean Coal Power Initiative to go to
gasification programs. These include gasification combined cycle, gas
fuel cells and turbine combined cycle, gasification coproduction, and
hybrid gasification, with the remainder of the money targeting other
"clean coal" power projects.
The compromise appears to split the difference between the House bill,
which had called for a 60-40 split, and the Senate bill, whose funding
was divided 80-20.
Clean coal funding is but one of the issues lawmakers will tackle today
as the energy conference, chaired by House Energy and Commerce Committee
Chairman Joe Barton (R-Texas), gets down to business on seven energy bill
titles that represent the easiest portions of the massive bill. Barton
hopes to complete the bill before a monthlong August recess starts at the
end of next week.
Other language to be discussed at today's conference meeting agreed to by
House and Senate staffers covers energy efficiency, nuclear power, Energy
Department management, personnel and training, vehicles and fuels, and
hydrogen. Lawmakers hope to quickly wrap up these issues to progress to
oil and gas, electricity and renewable portfolio standard, and climate
change during Thursday's markup session.
Also awaiting approval is a deal that Barton is working on to provide
liability protection for the producers of the controversial fuel
oxygenate MTBE, which has leaked into groundwater supplies around the
country, in exchange for a federal trust fund, partially funded by the
MTBE industry, for cleanup of existing pollution sites.
That deal is key to final passage of the energy bill, as liability
protection for MTBE producers in the 2003 energy bill gets much of the
blame for the Senate's failure to pass the conference report.
Also unresolved is the tax package. The Senate effectively ignored White
House calls for a $6.7 billion package when it passed a 10-year
collection of tax breaks scored at $18.4 billion, with $4.37 billion in
offsets. The House tax package was $8 billion but essentially constituted
a "placeholder" until the conference could come up with a deal acceptable
to all sides.
Also unclear is the fate of the Senate's incentives title -- a specific
section giving DOE broad authority to make loan guarantees to a variety
of energy projects, ranging from renewable energy systems to advanced
nuclear energy facilities to coal gasification combined-cycle technology
to carbon sequestration technology. Lawmakers and staffers on the Senate
side are particularly proud of that plan, but the House has no similar
provisions in its bill.
At this point, negotiators appear to be waiting for final word on the
size of the incentives title that would send staff into meetings to
figure out what programs get funded. But Senate energy tax staffers right
now are working on the tax package for the highway bill reauthorization,
so it is unclear just when the energy tax section will be completed.
With the tight conference schedule, Barton last week said he might
schedule sessions for this weekend to resolve outstanding issues. It is
unclear at this time whether that will be necessary. The conference must
leave enough time next week for senators and House members to review the
report and vote on it by the anticipated July 29 recess adjournment.
Other key points for tomorrow's energy conference debate:
Nuclear: The nuclear power title shows where the House and Senate
essentially blended their respective nuclear titles, by taking much of
the Senate's language on the "Next Generation Nuclear Plant" program and
the House's nuclear security language, which includes fingerprinting
requirements for people with unescorted access to facilities,
authorization of automatic weapons for security personnel regardless of
state laws, expanded penalties for sabotage and attempted sabotage, and a
new federal security study and corresponding enhancement of security
standards if needed.
Hydrogen: The hydrogen title outlines programs and goals for
creating a hydrogen market for vehicle, utility, commercial and
residential applications by 2020. The language outlines $3.3 billion in
authorized appropriations to cover hydrogen supply, fuel cell technology,
demonstration, codes and standards, as well as reviews of the program
both internally and externally, through the National Academy of Sciences.
Energy efficiency: The draft language retains the provision
inserted into the House energy bill that requires the start of Daylight
Savings Time the first Sunday of March and ending the last Sunday of
November.
DOE management: The draft language retains the Senate bill
provisions creating a new position of Undersecretary for Science, with
two assistant secretaries covering science and nuclear power. This title
governs technology transfer and the additional positions reflect an
emphasis on science and a recognition of the importance of nuclear power
within the agency.
Vehicles and fuels: There is little controversy in the draft
language in this title; however, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) at last week's
first conference committee meeting said he would introduce an amendment
here that would increase the corporate average fuel economy (CAFE)
standards by 1 mile per gallon per year in an effort to cut back on
gasoline consumption in the United States.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sign up to receive Sierra Club Insider, the flagship
e-newsletter. Sent out twice a month, it features the Club's
latest news and activities. Subscribe and view recent
editions at http://www.sierraclub.org/insider/
|
