Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - IOWA-TOPICS Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

IOWA-TOPICS Archives

December 2001, Week 1

IOWA-TOPICS@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
IOWA-TOPICS Home IOWA-TOPICS Home
IOWA-TOPICS December 2001, Week 1

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Response to Grocery Association
From:
Jane Clark <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements
Date:
Sun, 2 Dec 2001 18:20:23 -0800
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2182 bytes) , text/html (3556 bytes)
Thanks to Debbie for answering Eric's question.  The DNR has just gone through a process to revise the rules regarding the bottle bill and the revisions are probably not on the webpage yet since the process isn't over.  The notice of intended action on this will be presented at the December EPC meeting and then later would go to the Legislative Administrative Rules Committee.  This revision deals mostly with changes in wording, clarification, updating, etc. but has nothing to do with changing the law itself.

I would appreciate it if Debbie would expand on her comment -  "redemption centers do exist and they are a big part of the politics of this issue." 

Thanks,
Jane Clark
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Debbie Neustadt 
  To: [log in to unmask] 
  Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 8:43 AM
  Subject: Re: Response to Grocery Association


  Here is the answer to the question about the Iowa Code. Notice at the top of the section that Eric included  it says: 
  455C.3 Payment of refund value. 
  Except as provided in section 455C.4: 

  The "except as provided in section 455C.4 "  lists the situations in which you do not have to give a payment of refund value. I have copied that section below. The answer is that if a grocery store ( or any "dealer" ) did not want to accept returnables they could set up an agreement with a redemption center and have the department ok that. That is #2 on the list below. Just one more additional comment -  redemption centers do exist and they are a big part of the politics of this issues. 


  455C.4  Refusal to accept containers. 

  1.  Except as provided in section 455C.5, subsection 3, a dealer, a person operating a redemption center, a distributor or a manufacturer may refuse to accept any empty beverage container which does not have stated on it a refund value as provided under section 455C.2. 

  2.  A dealer may refuse to accept and to pay the refund value of any empty beverage container if the place of business of the dealer and the kind and brand of empty beverage containers are included in an order of the department approving a redemption center under section 455C.6. 





ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV