| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Sender: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Date: |
Tue, 4 Jun 2002 15:50:58 -0700 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
why don't you express these concerns to the d.m. register...these are grave
times which deserve to have the truth told about them...it sounds like the
register did not acurately characterize the report. i missed it, but it
sounds like they need to hear that we need to hear the truth...the news that
is....
----- Original Message -----
From: "Philip W. Scott" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: Global Warming, New York Times article
> The reason that Bush recommends adapting to inevitable changes is that
> he and his industrial buddies figure they can make a buck on it. What
> they don't yet grock is that the catastrophic changes we all will
> experience may result in a non-economic future: meaning that the very
> concept of marketplace and international or even national commerce will
> disappear along with a viable ecosystem.
>
> Jane Clark wrote:
>
> >Global Warming, New York Times articleThanks for sending this, Jack. The
> >fourth paragraph was especially interesting.
> >
> >"It recommends adapting to inevitable changes. It does not recommend
making
> >rapid reductions in greenhouse gases to limit warming, the approach
favored
> >by many environmental groups and countries that have accepted the Kyoto
> >Protocol, a climate treaty written in the Clinton administration that was
> >rejected by Mr. Bush. "
> >
> >A shortened version of this article, by Andrew Revkin of the New York
Times,
> >appeared in the Des Moines Register yesterday, page 3A. Here is the
> >paragraph as it read in the Register:
> >
> >"It instead recommends adating to inevitable changes. That is the
approach
> >favored by many environmental groups and countries and have accepted the
> >Kyoto Protocol, a Clinon-era climate treaty that the Bush Administration
> >rejected."
> >
> >What a very strange editing change.
> >
> >Jane Clark
> >
> >- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> >To get off the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
> >[log in to unmask]
> >
> >
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> To get off the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
> [log in to unmask]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To get off the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|