Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - IOWA-TOPICS Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

IOWA-TOPICS Archives

September 2002, Week 2

IOWA-TOPICS@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
IOWA-TOPICS Home IOWA-TOPICS Home
IOWA-TOPICS September 2002, Week 2

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Iowa Army ammunition plant toxic exposures
From:
Jack Eastman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements
Date:
Tue, 10 Sep 2002 21:37:56 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1253 bytes) , text/html (1568 bytes)
From Grist Email Magazine. Posted by Jack Eastman


DON'T GAG ME WITH A HEAVY METAL SPOON
Despite taking an oath of secrecy regarding their jobs, employees at
a nuclear weapons plant in Iowa will be allowed to talk to doctors
and scientists about hazardous chemicals to which they may have been
exposed, the Pentagon determined in a report issued yesterday.  The
oaths have posed problems for thousands of current or former
employees of the Iowa Army Ammunition Plant seeking medical care or
federal benefits, or attempting to take part in health studies.  From
the late 1940s to the mid-1970s, the plant assembled and test-fired
nuclear weapons components; it currently manufactures conventional
weapons.  Workers there may have been exposed to silica, beryllium,
solvents, explosives, epoxies, and heavy metals.  With the easing of
the rules, workers will be able to name the substances with which
they worked, but not discuss how each substance was used.  Sen. Tom
Harkin (D-Iowa) welcomed the change but called the Pentagon report
"woefully short on information about possible radioactive and toxic
exposures at the plant."

straight to the source:  San Francisco Chronicle, Associated Press,
Todd Dvorak, 09 Sep 2002
<http://www.gristmagazine.com/forward.pl?forward_id=452>




ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV