There was an article about the scorecard in the Sunday DM Register. Although
the reporter didn't list all the votes used for scoring, some of the votes
were:

By voting against the nomination of Secretary of the Interior Gale Norton
Opposing oil and gas drilling in national monument areas and off the Florida
coast
Backing campaign finance reform
Two of the Senate votes scored were on the farm bill.
Etc.

House votes included trade promotion authority, Arctic drilling, energy
efficiency  and restricitons on money for family planning.

No one vote cancels out the others.  Grassley scored 6 percent last year,
which probably means he voted the right way once on the issues according to
LCV.

Jane Clark
Des Moines
[log in to unmask]

----- Original Message -----
From: Philip W. Scott <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 8:13 PM
Subject: Re: Iowa Past Year League of Conservation Voter Score


> Thanks for the update.
> Anyone who votes for Latham must have 'bulging pockets'.  Grassley's
> score puzzles me - not that I am particularly enamored of the man - but
> he is a strong advocate for renewables.  Perhaps his pigheadedness over
> ANWR cancelled out the other factors.
>
> Charles Winterwood wrote:
>
> >Harkin 100%
> >Grassley 0%
> >
> >Boswell 71%
> >Leach 71%
> >Ganske 50%
> >Nussle 21%
> >Latham 7%
> >
> >>From Feb 24 Des Moines Register
> >

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
For SC email list T-and-C, send: GET TERMS-AND-CONDITIONS.CURRENT
to [log in to unmask]