Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - IOWA-TOPICS Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

IOWA-TOPICS Archives

April 2011, Week 2

IOWA-TOPICS@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
IOWA-TOPICS Home IOWA-TOPICS Home
IOWA-TOPICS April 2011, Week 2

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Wolves and Wilderness lose big!
From:
Phyllis Mains <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements
Date:
Wed, 13 Apr 2011 08:02:59 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (3230 bytes) , text/html (3808 bytes)

WASHINGTON - A last-minute budget deal reached by Congressional leaders
would block an Obama administration plan to make millions of acres of
undeveloped land in the West eligible for federal wilderness protection.

Republican lawmakers had complained that the wilderness plan would
circumvent Congress's authority and could be used to declare a vast swath
of public land off-limits to oil-and-gas drilling.

An agreement reached Friday night to avoid a government shutdown includes
language that prohibits the Interior Department from spending money to
implement the wilderness policy

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar announced the plan in December, reversing
a Bush-era policy that opened millions of acres of Western lands to
commercial development. The so-called "wild lands" policy would restore
eligibility for wilderness protection to millions of acres of public
lands.

Salazar calls the new policy a common-sense solution that would help the
agency better manage public lands, waters and wildlife, but critics
accused him of a land-grab that would lock up millions of prime acres in
the West.

Rep. Rob Bishop, R-Utah, said the policy would "destroy thousands of jobs
... and create a paralyzing uncertainty for Western communities." Elected
officials throughout the West have called for the plan to be halted,
Bishop said.

"The longer this initiative has been out in the public, the more concerns
I hear about the impact it will have on ranching, energy production,
recreation and even the Bureau of Land Management's own ability to manage
their lands," said Rep. Mike Simpson, R-Idaho.

The initiative oversteps the Interior Department's authority, Simpson
said, adding: "Only Congress has the authority to create new land
designations."

A spokeswoman for Salazar declined to comment Tuesday. But in a statement
last month the agency said that as a Westerner himself and a former
Colorado senator, Salazar believes the wild lands policy is a practical
approach that restores balance to the management of public lands.

The plan has drawn support from conservation groups and recreation
business owners, who say conservation of public lands is good business.
The groups cite the impact of tourism on Western economies.

The new policy by itself does not itself create any wild lands
designation, nor does it require that any particular lands be protected,
said Bob Abbey, director of the Bureau of Land Management. Designation as
wild land can only be made after public comments and review and does not
necessarily prohibit motor vehicle use or the staking of new mining
claims, Abbey said.

Planning for the new policy has already begun, and Abbey said last month
that designation of the first wild lands could occur as soon as this
summer in Idaho, Wyoming and Alaska. It was unclear Tuesday if those
designations would go forward.

The House is expected to take up the budget agreement as soon a s
Thursday.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]

Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp

To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see:
 http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp








ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV