Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - IOWA-TOPICS Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

IOWA-TOPICS Archives

September 2011, Week 4

IOWA-TOPICS@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
IOWA-TOPICS Home IOWA-TOPICS Home
IOWA-TOPICS September 2011, Week 4

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Today's DM Register Highlights facts
From:
Phyllis Mains <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements
Date:
Thu, 22 Sep 2011 07:03:28 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2104 bytes) , text/html (2725 bytes)
Benefit of environmental rules needs to be weighed
A recent Register article (“Officials: EPA Rules Hurt Growth,” Sept. 11)
repeats the now-popular misperception that all rules and regulations are
damaging to the economy and job growth.
Discussion of regulations only in light of their assumed threat to job
creation, while ignoring their role in protecting lives, public health
and the environment, is deeply misguided. And ignoring the potential for
regulations to actually create jobs is a costly mistake.
A 2011 report from the University of Massachusetts predicts that two
environmental protection air quality rules, which will reduce toxic
mercury from coal and the movement of fine particles and ozone across
state lines, will create 20,000 construction, engineering and management
jobs in Iowa over a five-year period, mostly in the private sector.
Conservative analysis of Clean Air Act programs show a four- or
five-to-one monetary benefit, compared to cost. In other words, for every
dollar spent, four to five dollars are saved. Most savings are in public
health and avoided medical expenses.
The acid rain program, launched in the 1990s, was considered necessary to
protect the environment and public health despite concerns about costs to
coal-fired facilities and the national economy. In reality, the program
has cost pennies on the projected dollar, resulting in considerable
health and environmental benefits.
A more accurate accounting of the impact of rules is needed from our
state and national leaders. They need to look beyond the up-front cost of
compliance and include all health, environmental and economic benefits
before regulations are summarily dismissed as bad for business.
— Leland Searles, Iowa Environmental Council, Des Moines

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]

Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp

To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see:
 http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp








ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV