Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - IOWA-TOPICS Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

IOWA-TOPICS Archives

March 2003, Week 4

IOWA-TOPICS@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
IOWA-TOPICS Home IOWA-TOPICS Home
IOWA-TOPICS March 2003, Week 4

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements" <[log in to unmask]>
Mime-version:
1.0
Date:
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 17:17:18 -0600
Reply-To:
"Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Subject:
Re: "Organic Quackery" Des Moines Register, March 21, 03, Letter-to-the-Editor:
From:
Jack Eastman <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (65 lines)
That was my rebuttal and I sent it to them smarty pants.

jack

on 3/22/03 4:43 PM, Philip Scott at [log in to unmask] wrote:

> Well then Jack, write a rebuttal.
> On Saturday, March 22, 2003, at 12:32 PM, Jack Eastman wrote:
>
>> How devious to use a literal interpretation of the word organic to
>> undermine
>> legitimate alternative systems of  farming which do not use harmful
>> chemicals that damage soil, pollute our water and lace our food with
>> toxins.
>>
>> Jack Eastman
>>
>>
>> Des Moines Register, March 21, 03, Letter-to-the-Editor:
>>
>> Organic Quackery:
>>
>> Consumers, don't be fooled. the issue over feed standards for so-called
>> "organic" livestock is one of marketing and profit, not of food
>> quality.
>>
>> The movement has succeeded in co-opting the term "organic" by defining
>> it in
>> a very narrow, inaccurate way. "Organic" simply means pertaining to or
>> derived from life. This includes chemicals such as benzene, all manner
>> of
>> petroleum products and food products of both conventional and
>> biotechnological processes.
>>
>> In short, all food is organic. To be inorganic, a substance must be
>> based on
>> or consists of non-biological material, such as silicon.
>>
>> Using the deception, the organic movement has created a very profitable
>> market niche. This niche would disappear were it not for the more
>> efficient,
>> economical, historically safe and increasingly sustainable modern
>> food-production methods the movement rails against in its propaganda.
>>
>> Let me take my turn in redefining so-called "organic" food. It should
>> be
>> labeled "pricey, over-marketed foodstuffs produced by inefficient,
>> labor-intensive means and marketed to the affluent and gullible."
>>
>> Jeff Clothier
>> Altoona
>>
>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>> To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see:
>> http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp
>>
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see:
> http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see:
 http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV