Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - IOWA-TOPICS Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

IOWA-TOPICS Archives

September 2010, Week 1

IOWA-TOPICS@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
IOWA-TOPICS Home IOWA-TOPICS Home
IOWA-TOPICS September 2010, Week 1

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
"Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Egg letter in plain text
From:
Jim H Clark <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 7 Sep 2010 13:05:00 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Jim H Clark <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (258 lines)
September 7, 2010
Tom Miller
Iowa Attorney General
1305 E. Walnut Street
Des Moines IA 50319
RE: Wright County Egg, Hillandale Farms of Iowa Inc., and Quality Egg LLC 
Feed Mill
Dear Mr. Miller:

The Iowa Chapter of the Sierra Club encourages you to perform a thorough 
investigation
of the circumstances surrounding the egg recall for shell eggs produced by 
Wright
County Egg and Hillandale Farms Inc for violations of state law. This 
investigation
should also include Quality Egg LLC Feed Mill, the supplier of the feed to 
both egg
producers. Additionally, we encourage you to review the operations at the 
two farms
responsible for the egg recall and the feed mill with an eye toward internal 
policy
changes, legislative needs, and administrative rule changes.

Investigation of violations
We encourage you to do a thorough investigation of the operations at these 
two egg
producers and the feed mill with an eye toward penalties, fines, and 
criminal prosecution
for violations of the state laws. We believe enough information has been 
published in the
press and on the Food and Drug Administration web site to warrant serious 
penalties
against Wright County Egg and Hillandale Farms Inc.
The recall for Hillandale extends to April 9 while the recall for Wright 
County Egg
extends to May 15. It is not clear when the egg producers first knew about 
the salmonella
enteritidis contamination of the eggs. The recall began in late August 2010. 
In an August
31, 2010, article, USA Today reported that salmonella had sickened at least 
1,470 people.
People exposed to salmonella can suffer serious health effects. The people 
who eat the
eggs are victims of the owners and operators of the egg production 
businesses; the
consumers are innocent of any malfeasance.
The Food and Drug Administration conducted inspections of the Quality Egg 
LLC Feed
Mill and related business entities facilities at Wright County Egg, and 
Hillandale Farms
of Iowa, Inc. in August 2010. The inspections show a pattern of filthy 
facilities, poorly
maintained buildings, and pest-infested facilities.
The egg producers showed a reckless disregard for the health and well-being 
of the public
by failing to recall the eggs in a timely manner.

Likewise operation of the egg farms show a reckless disregard for the health 
and wellbeing
of the public by failing to safely operate the farms, based on the Food and 
Drug
Administration 483 report. Wright County Egg and Hillandale Farms were 
filthy and
infested with flies and rodents.
The 483 report indicated problems at Wright County Egg that included:
1. A dark liquid that appeared to be manure was seeping though the concrete 
foundation
to the outside of the laying houses in several locations.
2. Standing water, three-inches high, was observed in one manure pit.
3. There were signs of structural damage to a number of the barns, including 
missing
siding, missing air vent screens, and gaps at the bottoms of the doors. 
Additionally,
the concrete foundations in several barns had holes and gaps.
4. There were signs of rodents and birds entering the buildings at the 
damage sites.
5. Access doors to manure pits were pushed out and provided openings to wild 
animals.
Piles of manure, four to eight feet high, pushed the doors outward.
6. Practices were not implemented to prevent the transfer of salmonella 
between poultry
houses.
7. Employees were not sanitizing equipment before they moved between poultry 
houses.
8. Manure was stacked so high in a manure pit that the door was blocked and 
could not
be opened.
9. Chickens were able to use the manure as a bridge to free themselves of 
their
confinement. They were able to access the egg-laying areas and tracking 
manure into
those areas.
10. Maggots were observed in the manure pit.
11. Large quantities of flies were found around egg belts and walkways.
12. The company-maintained records do not show that the company was 
conducting
inspections for rodents. Likewise, the company is not keeping records of 
disinfecting
the dead hen truck and disinfecting the trailer used to move pullets to 
laying houses.

Additionally the 483 report indicated problems at Hillandale Farms of Iowa 
that included:
1. No seal was found on the manure door on one building.
2. There was standing water next to the manure pits.
3. The inspector found liquid manure leaking into the first floor from the 
manure pit.
An employee reported that several weeks before the inspection the water line 
had
leaked and caused the manure pit to flood.
4. Leaking manure was flowing out of a gap in the door of the manure pit.
5. The producer did not bait and seal rodent burrow holes in the egg 
production
facilities.
6. There were signs of structural damage to a number of the barns, including 
holes and
missing siding. One building was missing a 15-foot by 3-foot section of 
siding,
leaving a hole in the side of the building. A 2-foot-by-2-foot hole was 
found in the
side of another building and a 5-inch by 3-inch hole in the siding of yet 
another
building. Several doors had significant gaps, including one door with a 
12-inch-wide
gap, one with a 6-inch-wide gap.
7. Uncaged hens had freed themselves of the confinement, had walked on piles 
of
manure in the manure pit, and were tracking manure from the manure pits into 
the
caged houses.

See http://www.fda.gov/Food/NewsEvents/WhatsNewinFood/ucm222684.htm - The
Food and Drug Administration web site has numerous pages concerning the 
inspection
reports and the egg recall. The 483 reports can be found on the FDA web 
pages.

Furthermore, the Food and Drug Administration has determined that the same 
strain of
salmonella contaminated the feed for both egg producers as Wright County Egg 
and
Hillandale Farms. The feed producer was Quality LLC Feed Mill, a sister 
company to
Wright County Egg.
Wright County Egg and Quality LLC Feed Mill are part of the Austin "Jack" 
DeCoster
conglomeration of business entities. Hillandale Farms purchased the feed and 
hens from
the DeCoster companies.
From all accounts, Jack DeCoster has had a troubled history with respect to 
following the
law concerning his animal operations both in Iowa and out of state. Federal 
authorities
fined him for health and safety violations in Maine. In Iowa, he was named 
an habitual
violator of environmental laws, fined $150,000, and banned from establishing 
additional
livestock operations for several years. Over a long period of time, Mr. 
DeCoster has
shown a wanton disregard for the law with respect to his businesses; the 
situation
surrounding the egg recall is more of the same behavior. Because past 
punishment has
not resolved the health, safety, and environmental issues surrounding Mr. 
DeCoster's
behavior, it is time to increase the penalties assessed against him.

Legislative and administrative rule changes
As state agencies undertake an investigation of the egg recall, we also 
believe that a
review of existing policy and legislation needs to be undertaken. Among the 
items that
need to be reviewed are:
1. Requiring mandatory vaccinations of chickens against salmonella
2. Mandatory recall of eggs and other food products when it is determined 
that they
have become contaminated. Voluntary compliance in recalls does not work in a 
way
that is consistent with protecting the public health.
3. Funding for regulatory staff to monitor concentrated animal feeding 
operations so that
problems like these egg producers are not allowed to fester for years needs 
to be
significantly increased.
4. Monitoring of the feed mills producing feed for concentrated animal 
feeding
operations needs to be implemented and enforced. Industrial-sized feed mills 
should
require extra inspection due to the large numbers of animals eating the 
food.

Summary
The behavior of these two egg producers is clearly a public health issue 
based on how
many people have been sickened prior to the recall and based on the poorly 
managed
operations of the facilities.
The egg recall and the obvious flaunting of the public health, safety, and 
environmental
laws is an embarrassment to all Iowans. It could have long-lasting effects 
on our ability
to sell all of our agricultural products outside of the state, which would 
affect the wellbeing
of Iowans and businesses operating in Iowa.
Iowa needs to send a strong message that Iowa is not open to businesses who 
flaunt the
health, safety, and environmental laws of the state and country. By 
enforcing our
existing laws and regulations and by strengthening the ones that currently 
are in effect,
Iowa will not be in a race to the bottom by our country's companies that are 
the most
polluting, most unhealthy, and least protecting of human health. The bad 
apples,
including the companies involved in the egg recall, must be stopped.
It is also time to put some teeth in Iowa's laws with respect to how 
concentrated animal
feeding operations respond to the laws and regulations of the state. 
Voluntary
compliance does not work for business entities who flagrantly violate the 
laws as the
DeCoster conglomeration of companies has been doing.
On behalf of over 5,000 Iowans who are members of the Iowa Chapter of the 
Sierra Club,
we appreciate your pursuing violations against the egg producers and 
recommending
strong rules and legislation so that similar problems never reoccur.

Sincerely,
Wallace L. Taylor
Legal Chair
Sierra Club, Iowa Chapter
References
http://www.fda.gov/Food/NewsEvents/WhatsNewinFood/ucm222684.htm - The Food
and Drug Administration web site has numerous pages concerning the 
inspection reports
and the egg recall. The 483 reports can be found on the FDA web pages.
Elizabeth Weise and Phil Brasher, "Filth found at 2 Iowa egg farms", USA 
Today,
August 31, 2010
"Rodents, filth found at Iowa egg farms," Cedar Rapids Gazette, August 31, 
2010
"Answers about the giant egg recall", DesMoinesRegister.com, August 24, 2010
Perry Beeman, "DeCoster took control of egg operation after state ban,"
DesMoinesRegister.com, August 28, 2010 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]

Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp

Sign up to receive Sierra Club Insider, the flagship
e-newsletter. Sent out twice a month, it features the Club's
latest news and activities. Subscribe and view recent
editions at http://www.sierraclub.org/insider/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV