Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - IOWA-TOPICS Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

IOWA-TOPICS Archives

December 1999, Week 2

IOWA-TOPICS@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
IOWA-TOPICS Home IOWA-TOPICS Home
IOWA-TOPICS December 1999, Week 2

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Hallett's Quarry
From:
Peggy Murdock <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements
Date:
Fri, 10 Dec 1999 10:34:54 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (81 lines)
My major concern here is that a wetland, important to this area in
mitigating drought and flood will be paved over and filled in.  That means
we will be more vulnerable to drought and flood.

Next I am concerned about the paving and filling of yet another natural
area in Iowa.  We have very few left.

Peggy Murdock

At 09:57 PM 12/9/99 , you wrote:
>Are you worried about storm drains, or water from gutters? SCS advises
>farmers to use small earthern berms perpendicular to the downhill flow to
>control runoff from fields. Perhaps proper contouring of yards by the
>developer could solve some of the problems. I am sure the local SCS experts
>can provide the expertise needed.
>
>Are they planting aquatic plants in the storm water retention area?
>Developers do not like to do it, but in some states they are now required
>to do so. The plants help reduce some of the lawn nutrients. Would also
>suggest a ban on Chem Lawn applications within the development, and allow
>dry fertilizer applications only in the fall. Our neighbor in MI had to
>stop his Chen Lawn treatments so he could refinance his house at a lower
>mortgage rate. His well water tested 11ppm for nitrates (limit is 10).
>After 6 months of no Chemlawn, he passed the nitrate test, but mortgage
>rates had already gone up again! Anyway, if this development is bordering a
>source of important drinking water, it is something to consider.
>                                         Linda Bystrak
>
>At 08:23 PM 12/9/99 -0600, you wrote:
> >For the past few months the area called Hallett's Quarry just north of the
> >Ames city limits has been the focus of development planning by Hubbel
> >Construction.  Brian O'Connell, Director of the Department of Planning and
> >Housing in Ames has listened to environmentalists and negotiated some
> >concessions from the firm in the past few months, notably a 3-4 acre
> >wetland to process some of the runoff.  It's a five year storm water
> >retention area, and will not be able to handle the run-off from the kinds
> >of rain events we have seen this past decade.
> >
> >This is an area characterized by hydric soils (that means it is a
> >wetland).  It protects our area in drought and flood.  The quarry has no
> >outlet, so everything that goes in stays in, and because this is ground
> >water, it is additionally critical that the water remain clean.  In times
> >of drought, the city pumps water from the lake over to the South Skunk so
> >that it will refresh our aquifer which lies just below a dam just
> downstream.
> >
> >The plans for the area are actually quite attractive.  They include a bike
> >path, a lighthouse (a private club for the residents, but attractive to
> >passers by), and many walkways.  The lake would be open for paddle craft
> >and electric motors so fishing would be an option.  If it were not for the
> >destruction of this wetland and the possible disturbance of migrating
> >birds, this would be an ideal development for any area.
> >
> >A minimal riparian area has been planned around the waterbody of 70 feet
> >which will include  the bike path.  The last time I inquired the riparian
> >area was to go around only 3/4 of this groundwater lake, leaving the rest
> >without any buffer whatsoever.
> >
> >Next Wednesday the commissioners will decide whether to send this on to the
> >city council for their approval.  Comments to go in the packet to be
> >considered by the commissioners should be in the Planning and Housing
> >office by noon tomorrow.  The public will be given an opportunity to
> >comment at the next meeting, which will be held at 7pm Wednesday, December
> >15th.
> >
> >Peggy Murdock
> >
> >- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> >To get off the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
> >[log in to unmask]
> >
> >
>
>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>To get off the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
>[log in to unmask]

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
For SC email list T-and-C, send: GET TERMS-AND-CONDITIONS.CURRENT
to [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV