What's the rush? If it doesn't pass in lame duck, it will in January.
 Why try to hold your finger in the dyke when the tsunami has already
passed over your head? And if you don't have scuba equipment start
saying your prayers.

Jane Clark wrote:

>National Call-In Day on Bad Fire Bill - Tomorrow - November 7
>
>**It is critical to call both the key congressmen (below) and your own
>congressperson, (202-224-3121 -- Capitol switchboard or call local offices)
>and respectfully urge them to oppose H.R. 5319.
>
>Congressman Scott McInnis' bad fire bill is likely to be pushed for a vote
>next week during the lame duck session of Congress. The McInnis bill passed
>through committee before Congress broke for the election recess. Key
>democrats including Mark Udall (D-CO) voted for the bill.
>
>The bill would drastically limit citizen watch dogging by shortening time
>for review and appeal, eliminating consideration of alternative actions, and
>reducing time for judicial review to the point that it will be next to
>impossible to effectively challenge ecologically destructive projects. The
>bill also pushes provisions allowing trade of large valuable trees for
>logging and other services.
>
>Negotiations on this destructive bill continue with other key democrats such
>as George Miller (D-CA) and Peter DeFazio (D-OR) and moderate republicans
>including Sherwood Boehlert (R-NY). Congressmen Miller and DeFazio declined
>to vote for the bill earlier but have indicated a deal is still possible.
>
>It is critical to call both the key congressmen (below) and your own
>congressperson, (202-224-3121 -- Capitol switchboard or call local offices)
>and respectfully urge them to oppose H.R. 5319 and specifically to:
>
>Oppose any expedited procedures for hazardous fuels projects. The Forest
>Service is already abusing this program to justify old growth logging and
>entry into roadless areas Additional discretion for the agency is likely to
>cause additional harm to the forests. There is no justification for
>expedited procedures because there is no evidence that conservationists have
>been stopping legitimate fuel reduction projects.
>
>Oppose goods for services stewardship contracts that create an incentive to
>log old growth and other commercially valuable trees.
>
>Oppose any limits on the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Without
>alternatives, NEPA is essentially gutted. In this case, it will allow the
>Forest Service to offer just one brand of fuel reduction projects
>(industrial logging grade) with little or no analysis about the potential
>environmental harm.
>
>Oppose any limits to judicial review
>For more information or to review the bill.
>
>
>  Phone Fax Staff
>Rep. Sherwood Boehlert  202/225-8772  226-0113  David Goldston
>Rep. George Miller  202/225-2095  225-5609  Amelia Jenkins
>Rep. Peter DeFazio  202/225-6416 225-0032 David Dreher
>Rep. Mark Udall  202/225-2161  226-7840  Stan Sloss
>
>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>For SC email list T-and-C, send: GET TERMS-AND-CONDITIONS.CURRENT
>to [log in to unmask]
>
>

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
For SC email list T-and-C, send: GET TERMS-AND-CONDITIONS.CURRENT
to [log in to unmask]