Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - IOWA-TOPICS Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

IOWA-TOPICS Archives

March 2011, Week 3

IOWA-TOPICS@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
IOWA-TOPICS Home IOWA-TOPICS Home
IOWA-TOPICS March 2011, Week 3

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Enviroscribe: Iowa Environmental News-Proposed new Nuclear Plant
From:
Donna Buell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements
Date:
Sat, 19 Mar 2011 07:52:00 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (126 lines)
Is there any other kind of business deal anymore?  After all, we must feed the monopolies.
Donna




On Mar 18, 2011, at 7:43 PM, gerald neff <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Sounds like a win, win situation for MidAmerican and lose, lose situation for everyone else.  This kind of business deal is absurd.  Jerry Neff
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Charles Winterwood <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:08:02 -0500 (CDT)
> Subject: Fw: Enviroscribe: Iowa Environmental News-Proposed new Nuclear Plant
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Enviroscribe: Iowa Environmental News 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> MidAmerican president: Iowans face 10 percent rate increase for nuclear plant 
> Posted: 17 Mar 2011 02:28 PM PDT
> MidAmerican Energy customers would see their power bills rise 10 percent over a 
> decade to pay for the investor-owned utility’s share of a proposed Iowa nuclear 
> plant, the firm’s president told lawmakers Thursday.
> That doesn’t include what the utility would pay for new generation from wind or 
> other fuels.
> William Fehrman  fielded questions from lawmakers about a proposed 1,000 to 
> 1,600 megawatt nuclear plant to be built by MidAmerican and partners at an 
> unspecified Iowa site. Among the spots under consideration, Fehrman acknowledged 
> Thursday: the area surrounding Iowa’s only nuclear plant,Duane Arnold Energy 
> Center in Palo near Cedar Rapids.
> Senators on a commerce subcommittee questioned if the nuclear disaster in Japan 
> should delay work in Iowa. Fehrman said the difference between the modular, 
> build-in-chunks plant MidAmerican is eyeing and the old technology in Japan is 
> like the difference between a smart phone and a rotary dial model.  He said the 
> bill is needed to keep nuclear as one of the utility’s options and to attract 
> investors.
> Regarding rates, Fehrman said Iowans will pay more no matter how the utility 
> decides to address energy needs as the state grows and federal environmental 
> regulators make burning coal a more expensive proposition.
> “There is no doubt that costs are going to go up,” Fehrman said, noting the 
> utility hasn’t raised rates since 1995. “We need to keep them down as much as 
> possible.”
> Fehrman said the utility would hold down costs by selling excess power from the 
> plant. He added that most of the rate increase attributed to the plant would 
> come in the latter part of the decade.
> A recent study by the Illinois Commerce Commission listed nuclear as one of the 
> cheapest power-generation options based on the price per kilowatt hour, Fehrman 
> said.
> The plant, if approved by the Iowa Utilities Board, would come online in late 
> 2020 at the earliest, Fehrman said.
> Sen. Swati Dandekar of Marion said Iowans are concerned about paying for a 
> project that may cost more than the utility thinks, given the nation’s record on 
> cost overruns at nuclear plants.
> “There is no doubt there is a history of cost overruns in this industry,” 
> Fehrman said. “We’ve asked for more oversight of this project, and that’s in the 
> bill.”
> MidAmerican is pushing legislation that would set some of the rate-making 
> principles to be applied to the plant, in effect telling investors how the 
> utility would recover its expenses.
> Opposition to the bill continued to mount Thursday. The Iowa Sierra Club, with 
> its lawyer in tow, delivered 160 letters opposing the legislation to Gov. Terry 
> Branstad. “At this time of unspeakable tragedy and unimaginable chaos in Japan, 
> Iowa is still considering promoting nuclear power,” said Pam Mackey-Taylor, who 
> leads the chapter’s energy efforts. “Nuclear energy is not the answer.”
> Only senators were allowed to speak Thursday, but AARP was prepared to speak 
> against the bill. “AARP believes it is unfair to consumers and bad policy for 
> the Iowa General Assembly to enact legislation that would allow utility 
> companies to charge consumers in advance for costs of a new plant before it is 
> in service, and require consumers to continue to have to pay even if the plant 
> development is canceled, or goes over budget,” the group representing senior 
> citizens said in a statement. “AARP is concerned about this legislation, not 
> because of the question of nuclear power, but because we oppose raising rates 
> for consumers already struggling to afford their utility bills for a plant yet 
> to be built, where we don’t know the actual cost to build, and may or may not 
> even be built in Iowa.”
> Fehrman acknowledged that ratepayers would cover expenses for the project even 
> if it is canceled.
> Representatives of the Iowa Environmental Council attended Thursday’s session. 
> You are subscribed to email updates from Des Moines Register Staff Blogs » 
> Enviroscribe: Iowa Environmental News 
> 
> To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. Email delivery powered 
> by Google 
> 
> Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> To unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
> [log in to unmask]
> 
> Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
> http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp
> 
> Sign up to receive Sierra Club Insider, the flagship
> e-newsletter. Sent out twice a month, it features the Club's
> latest news and activities. Subscribe and view recent
> editions at http://www.sierraclub.org/insider/
> 
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> To unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
> [log in to unmask]
> 
> Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
> http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp
> 
> Sign up to receive Sierra Club Insider, the flagship
> e-newsletter. Sent out twice a month, it features the Club's
> latest news and activities. Subscribe and view recent
> editions at http://www.sierraclub.org/insider/

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]

Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV