Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - IOWA-TOPICS Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

IOWA-TOPICS Archives

August 2002, Week 2

IOWA-TOPICS@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
IOWA-TOPICS Home IOWA-TOPICS Home
IOWA-TOPICS August 2002, Week 2

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Out the Dorr
From:
Paul Rebers <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements
Date:
Mon, 12 Aug 2002 20:55:33 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2051 bytes) , text/html (2285 bytes)
As far as I am concerned, the harder Bush pushes to get his way, the harder
i will fight back.   After all our Constitution was designed to minimize
the opportunity for one person to control it by force,  and efforts of one
man to force his opinion on our Nation get me riled up.   The Senate has a
legitimate right to require thoughtful discussion of all issues.   We need
Harkin,  Jeffords,  Ann Riichards,  Daschle, etc to help overcome the Bush
Bull-Dozer

At 06:32 PM 08/12/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>I had similar thoughts when Clinton left and Bush came in and has redone
>some of the rules that were not finalized.  Why couldn't Clinton just get
>stuff done faster !?! I think the Bush administration has not stopped at
>rolling back what was in process of getting done
>but is rolling back anything it possibly can.
>
>I think Harkin did a good job in keeping him from being confirmed for as
>long as he did. If he had not been for 9/11, the Farm Bill and corporate
>scandals, Dorr would have been dealt with in the Senate Ag Committee
>sooner. A Republican controlled Senate committee might
>have gotten the nomination out sooner and with a recommendation to
>confirm. Harkin made Bush do what Bush did and Harkin can say he worked as
>best he could. Harkin can say he did it in a way that was not
>"obstructionists"  and also tried to do what is liberal
>constituents wanted.
>
>I think we have Dorr for three years and not one.
>
>Shelley Sheehy wrote:
>
> > I think that its pretty amazing that this group didn't see that if Bush
> put Dorr through this much, that he would certainly make a recess
> appointment.  I have to believe that Harkin saw it coming too.  Oh well,
> how much damage can he do in one year! (A lot-I know!)
> > sls
> >
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > For SC email list T-and-C, send: GET TERMS-AND-CONDITIONS.CURRENT
> > to [log in to unmask]
>
>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>For SC email list T-and-C, send: GET TERMS-AND-CONDITIONS.CURRENT
>to [log in to unmask]


ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV