| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Sender: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 6 Mar 2002 10:46:16 -0600 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Folks,
From what I understand, the current plan is thus:
There are three short distance train zones (California, Pacific NW (Eugene,
OR-Vancouver, BC) and the Northeast), Amtrak has enough cash to keep these
running.
Long distance trains:
Most will be contracted out to other firms. Service disruptions may occur but
will be minor. In fact, service may increase, including a new train being
proposed along the I-80 corridor, originating in Chicago.
David
>===== Original Message From "Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements"
<[log in to unmask]> =====
>It is ironic that Amtrak reports record income and passenger traffic at a
>time when news reports indicate that Iowa could loose its Amtrak service.
>Two years ago we used Amtrak to go to Glacier National Park. All the
>passengers I talked with had their reasons for taking the train and none
>mentioned nostalgic motives. If and when the passenger trains quit running it
>will be a sad day for America. Jerry Neff
>
>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>To get off the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
>[log in to unmask]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To get off the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|