Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - IOWA-TOPICS Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

IOWA-TOPICS Archives

March 2002, Week 2

IOWA-TOPICS@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
IOWA-TOPICS Home IOWA-TOPICS Home
IOWA-TOPICS March 2002, Week 2

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Fwd: Sierra Club Currents (online newsletter)
From:
erin jordahl IA <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements
Date:
Wed, 13 Mar 2002 14:06:10 EST
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (3535 bytes) , text/html (4091 bytes)
Sierra Club Currents -- BP Chief is Greener than the Bush Administration
Volume II, #18
Tuesday, March 12

-----

Quote of the Day:

"How long will it take for people to get angry enough to take action?  How
many children must die?"
         ------Molly Ivins, on America's environment

-----

(1) ENERGY: BP Chief is Greener than the Bush Administration
(2) PUBLIC LANDS: California Wilderness Area is Oil and Gas Industry's
Latest Target
(3) CLEAN WATER: Container Port Plan Meets Opposition Yet Again


-----

1. BP Chief is Greener than the Bush Administration

Looks like even the oil industry is having second thoughts about drilling
the Arctic and polluting our air.  Responding to a question from a Sierra
Clubber during a speech, British Petroleum chief Lord John Browne declined
to throw his support behind efforts to exploit the National Wildlife
Refuge.  Later, he voiced support for requiring industry to emit less
global warming pollution, stating that "it's necessary to have mandatory
standards" on carbon dioxide emissions.

The Bush administration supports drilling the Arctic.  And its global
warming plan, released last month, cited economic concerns to justify
rejecting fixed standards in favor of an incentive-based scheme which has
not proved successful in the past.  But BP has dramatically reduced the
amount of global warming pollution it emits, without hurting its bottom
line.  Maybe Lord John could teach the Bush administration a thing or two!

For more information on this story, go to
http://www.bayarea.com/mld/cctimes/2843209.htm

----

2. California Wilderness Area is Oil and Gas Industry's Latest Target

Thought the Arctic Refuge was the only area of pristine wilderness
threatened by the Bush-Cheney energy plan?  Think again.  In the name of
"energy independence", the U.S. Forest Service has proposed opening up
140,000 roadless acres of California's Los Padres National Forest to oil
and gas leasing.

Just like in Alaska, an area of rare ecological value could be sacrificed
for a minuscule amount of oil.  The land in jeopardy is home to over 20
endangered or threatened plants and animals, including the majestic
California condor.  And the oil available amounts to less than one percent
of the total to be found on federal lands.  A public comment period begins
in April, and a decision is expected this summer.  Stay tuned.

For more information on the threat to the Los Padres National Forest, go to
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2002/03/11/M

N59606.DTL

----

3. Container Port Plan Meets Opposition Yet Again

Join the club.  Another Rhode Island town has added its name to the growing
list of communities who are saying "No" to the Governor's plan to build a
massive container port  at Quonset Point.  Warwick last night became the
13th town in the Ocean State to give a formal thumbs-down to the idea.  In
fact, so many concerned citizens showed up to a town council meeting to
voice their opposition that the thirty minutes set aside for public
comments quickly turned into ninety!

The Sierra Club has led the fight to "keep our bay blue".  A container port
would undercut the cleanup of the bay, cost taxpayers millions, cause
massive congestion on Rhode Island's highways, and gravely threaten air
quality.  Seems like a lose-lose scenario to us!

For more information on the battle to "keep our bay blue", go to
http://www.projo.com/report/stories/07208311.htm
  -----


Erin Jordahl
Director, Iowa Chapter Sierra Club
3839 Merle Hay Road, Suite 280
Des Moines, IA 50310
515-277-8868
[log in to unmask]
[log in to unmask]


ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV