Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - IOWA-TOPICS Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

IOWA-TOPICS Archives

June 2001, Week 4

IOWA-TOPICS@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
IOWA-TOPICS Home IOWA-TOPICS Home
IOWA-TOPICS June 2001, Week 4

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
wetland mitigation failing
From:
Cindy Hildebrand <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements
Date:
Thu, 28 Jun 2001 12:29:12 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (45 lines)
Thanks, Jack.  I hope the National Academy of Sciences report will help force
a few policy-makers to acknowledge that the wetland-mitigation emperor has no
clothes.

I can't resist a personal observation.   When I attended a national
conference on natural areas and prairies in 1998, one of the highlights was a
slide show of so-called mitigation wetlands in the Chicago area.    Most were
small deep sterile ponds surrounded by mowed grass that extended right down
to the water.  Most were located in the middle of development, and several
had nearby parking lots and buildings that were obvious sources of polluted
runoff.   Except for a few unhappy clumps of cattails, they had no wetland
vegetation.

Even domestic ducks wouldn't have liked those "wetlands".   They were so
atrocious that each new slide was greeted with hoots of laughter.   But the
idea that someone was actually counting those pathetic ponds as part of the
no-net-loss wetland equation wasn't funny.

I should add, to be fair, that good wetland restorationists who know and care
about what they are doing can achieve very impressive results.   However,
they are also the first to point out (as did the Academy report) that most
groundwater-driven wetlands with uncommon plants, such as fens, bogs and wet
prairies, cannot be mitigated and should be left alone.

I saw a few good-quality restored wetlands during conference field trips, and
they were inspiring.   It's no coincidence that those wetlands had been
restored and were being managed by dedicated agencies, non-profits, and
volunteers, not reluctant developers.    Good wetland restoration requires
knowledge, time, money, hard work, and ongoing management.   Those elements
have been absent from many mitigation projects.


Cindy Hildebrand
[log in to unmask]
Ames, IA  50010

"The end of all our exploring
Will be to arrive where we started
And know the place for the first time."
(T.S. Eliot)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
For SC email list T-and-C, send: GET TERMS-AND-CONDITIONS.CURRENT
to [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV