Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - IOWA-TOPICS Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

IOWA-TOPICS Archives

March 2002, Week 4

IOWA-TOPICS@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
IOWA-TOPICS Home IOWA-TOPICS Home
IOWA-TOPICS March 2002, Week 4

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: CAFO Proposal, Corrected
From:
Paul Rebers <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements
Date:
Fri, 22 Mar 2002 09:48:49 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (65 lines)
Some of the local family farmers I have talked to would like to see a 
total  ban on the ownership of livestock by packers..   Can this be done on 
a state level?  If I remember right, there is a possible ban on the federal 
level.  Both farmers live in the Nevada area.  One has retired, and one is 
still in the business, Dave Swensen, (515) 382-5716  who raises about 500 pigs.

At 07:46 AM 03/22/2002 -0600, you wrote:
>DELETE earlier email, some typos included. Lyle
>
>
>Sierrans:
>
>Yesterday afternoon the Working Group of 12 held a press conference at which
>they announced the elements of the CAFO plan they have proposed. All 12 were
>at the press conference, with Senate Majority Leader Iverson, and have
>agreed to the proposal, enthusiastically with one exception.
>
>The DM Register this morning carries an article that outlines the proposal
>fairly well and accurately. The bill draft will be available to us at noon
>today, Friday.
>
>I have convened a group of the environmental lobby and representatives from
>a few other environmental groups, basically the coalition that meets weekly
>on Mondays at the IEC office. We will be going over the bill draft in detail
>today, and developing our strategy for the remainder of the session.
>
>At this time, what we know is very positive; we can be fairly enthusiastic
>in our approach toward what has been proposed. The producer groups and big
>operators are apoplectic in their chagrin at the proposal.
>
>CCI does not like it as it does not go far enough in local control for them.
>We will be looking carefully at that part too.
>
>NOTE: For a bit yet, please be careful in any responses you make to it to
>press or public, while we finish our look at the details and get the
>information out to you.
>
>The momentum is on our side now, and we must nurture that carefully and
>fully.
>
>Thanks. This may turn out to be a pretty good year for the environment on
>this issue at least.
>
>Major elements are:
>Increased setbacks, and flood plain prohibition
>Permits fees and additional staff
>Lower permit thresholds (animal units)
>Development of air quality monitoring and program
>Development of a Phosphorus standard and program
>Improved manure management plans
>Local Ścontrolą matrix, final decision at DNR
>
>More later.
>
>Lyle Krewson
>Sierra Club, Iowa lobbyist
>
>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>To get off the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
>[log in to unmask]

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To get off the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV