| Sender: |
|
| X-To: |
|
| Date: |
Thu, 9 Mar 2000 05:25:54 -0600 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Content-type: |
text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Content-transfer-encoding: |
quoted-printable |
| Mime-version: |
1.0 |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Fellow Sierrans:
As you know, the Water Quality bill was amended and passed the Senate on
Tuesday evening. The Senate struck everything after the enacting clause, and
completely re-wrote the bill. It is much improved from the original version,
although with remaining concerns.
The Senate amendments did at least these changes:
³and² to ³or² in the definition of Credible Data -- this was a major victory
for our side;
removed the pre-approval requirement for credible data from volunteer
monitoring programs -- the second major victory for our side;
requires ³collaboration² between DNR and DOT concerning wetlands --
innocuous as they certainly already do this;
wetlands mitigation must give priority to mitigation in the same watershed
-- a significant victory;
other miscellaneous change.
Following is the URL for SF 2371 as amended and passed by the Senate, the
complete new language (obviously much language is the same, with modest
tweaks):
http://www.legis.state.ia.us/GA/78GA/Legislation/SF/02300/SF02371/Current.ht
ml
It is certainly an improved bill. We will all be working closely on it in
the House, where I worry more about weakening than strengthening amendments.
The House can be a 'tougher nut' on these issues.
Lyle
____________________________________________
Lyle Krewson
6403 Aurora Avenue #3
Des Moines, IA 50322-2862
[log in to unmask]
515/276-8947 - Phone/Fax
____________________________________________
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
For SC email list T-and-C, send: GET TERMS-AND-CONDITIONS.CURRENT
to [log in to unmask]
|
|
|