| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements |
| Date: | Wed, 4 Sep 2002 12:23:26 -0500 |
| Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I just did it as a friendly notice, I didn't mean any harm, as I have
been guilty of the same when I first started using list-serves. My
apologies if anyone was offended.
Phil
Johanna Hudson wrote:
> Phil,
>
> I hope this message means that you know the Hurleys and were sending a
> pleasant greeting to them, not that you were implying they shouldn't
> be using the list-serve for private mail. (Surely not that, since
> you did the same thing with your reply.) Anyway, I did this too when
> I was new to the list and thought my reply would go only to the
> sender --in fact, I have accidentally done it a time or two since.
> It's always embarrassing when my intended-to-be-private e-mail comes
> back to me as a list message. I expect the Hurley's reaction was the
> same.
>
> Jo
> ---------- - - - - - - - - -
> From: "Philip W. Scott" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Letter to the Editor
> Date: Tue, Sep 3, 2002, 3:04 PM
>
>
> Glen,
> Looks like private mail got on the group list-serve. How's the
> basement coming?
>
|
|
|