Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - IOWA-TOPICS Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

IOWA-TOPICS Archives

November 2011, Week 3

IOWA-TOPICS@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
IOWA-TOPICS Home IOWA-TOPICS Home
IOWA-TOPICS November 2011, Week 3

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Today DM Register--Thanks Jim!
From:
gerald neff <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements
Date:
Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:25:04 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
What is really an open and shut case is some way not.  I don't understand how this can be debatable.  A great letter.  Thanks Jim.  Jerry
----- Original Message -----
From: Phyllis Mains <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:15:59 -0600 (CST)
Subject: Today DM Register--Thanks Jim!

Rastetter's clean-water vote was a clear conflict
Brent Rastetter gave $31,000 to the Branstad for Governor campaign. The
owner of a multimillion dollar firm that constructs factory farms was
rewarded by our governor with an appointment to the Environmental
Protection Commission, whose duty is to protect Iowa’s environment.
In June Rastetter voted to discard rules to bring Iowa into compliance
with the Federal Clean Water Act. This vote was in his interest as a
builder of confinement agriculture buildings rather than assuring Iowa
citizens clean drinking water.
The Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement filed a complaint against
Rastetter with the Iowa Ethics and Campaign Disclosure Board who listened
to arguments, discussed the situation in closed session and then voted to
disallow the complaint, ruling that Rastetter did not profit specifically
from his vote.
Rastetter’s vote allowed more confinement agriculture buildings to be
built. It follows that his vote opened more business opportunities for
him. Thus Rastetter was remunerated as a result of his vote. It was
clearly a conflict of interest.
The board did not consider the profit he made because of his vote in June
and it should reconsider its action and ask Rastetter to resign from the
Environmental Protection Commission.
— Jim Riggs, Urbandale

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]

Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]

Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV