Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - IOWA-TOPICS Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

IOWA-TOPICS Archives

July 2006, Week 3

IOWA-TOPICS@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
IOWA-TOPICS Home IOWA-TOPICS Home
IOWA-TOPICS July 2006, Week 3

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
"Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: FW: Vote Chart on Independent Peer Review for Armt Corp of Engineers
From:
"Redmond, Jim" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 20 Jul 2006 10:52:06 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (93 lines)
Charlie,
 
Can we find out why Harkin didn't back the review amendment?
We also lost the vote on the Mississippi locks.  How do we approach Harkin on that one?
 
 
Jim

________________________________

From: Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements on behalf of Charles Winterwood
Sent: Thu 7/20/2006 9:08 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Fwd: FW: Vote Chart on Independent Peer Review for Armt Corp of Engineers





WE WON THE VOTE BUT BOTH HARKIN AND GRASSLEY VOTED
AGAINST INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
PROJECTS.

 VOTE ON FEINGOLD-MCCAIN INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW
> AMENDMENT
>
>       We won * 54 to 46.  The Inhofe-Bond Review
> amendment went down 49 to 51. 
> So we won the first round!!!  Great job everyone.
>
>       Prioritization will be much tougher so please make
> yet another call.  You
> can thank your senators who voted correctly and
> scold those who did not. 
> Tell the no voters to make it up to us on
> prioritization! Capitol
> switchboard is 202/224-3121.
>
>       YES VOTES
>
> Akaka, Alexander, Allard, Baucus, Bayh, Biden,
> Bingaman, Boxer, Brownback,
> Byrd, Cantwell, Carper, Chafee, Clinton, Coburn,
> Collins, DeMint, DeWine,
> Dodd, Durbin, Ensign, Feingold, Feinstein,Graham,
> Gregg, Inouye, Jeffords,
> Johnson, Kennedy, Kerry, Kohl, Kyl, Landrieu,
> Lautenberg, Leahy, Levin,
> Lieberman, McCain, Menendez, Mikulsi, Murray,
> Nelson-FL, Obama, Reed, Reid,
> Rockefeller, Salazar, Sarbanes, Schumer, Snowe,
> Stabenow, Sununu, Voinovich,
> Wyden
>
>
>       NO VOTES
>
> Allen, Bennett, Bond, Bunning, Burns, Burr,
> Chambliss, Cochran, Coleman,
> Conrad, Cornyn, Craig, Crapo, Dayton, Dole,
> Domenici, Dorgan, Enzi, Frist,
> Grassley, Hagel, Harkin, Hatch, Hutchison, Inhofe,
> Isakson, Lincoln, Lott,
> Lugar, Martinez, McConnell, Murkowski, Nelson-NE,
> Pryor, Roberts, Santorum,
> Sessions, Shelby, Smith, Specter, Stevens, Talent,
> Thomas, Thune, Vitter,
> Warner
>
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> - - - - - -
> To get off the CONS-MRCC-ENGINEER-ACTIVISTS list,
> send any message to:
>
[log in to unmask]
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com <http://mail.yahoo.com/> 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see:
 http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp 


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see:
 http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV