| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements |
| Date: | Mon, 19 Dec 2011 00:07:45 -0500 |
| Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Wally,
Some questions:
1. Is the rationale for the court ruling that the Clean Water Act National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits are not required
for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) the fact that pollutant
emissions from a CAFO into waterways are not expected to occur routinely, as
they would from, say, a sewage treatment plant, but only occasionally--and
then only by accident? What other rationale could there be? (Not a
rhetorical question; if you know of alternative reasoning the court could be
following, I would be fascinated to hear it.)
2. Maybe the need to ask is a sign of my naivete, but is the omission of
so many categories of required information in the proposed rule an oversight
on the part of the EPA, or the result blatant pro-industry bias?
3. Are you doing this excellent work pro-bono, as I suspect you are? If so
thank you. If not, it's worth every penny the Chapter can pay you.
Tom
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]
Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp
To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp
|
|
|