Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - IOWA-TOPICS Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

IOWA-TOPICS Archives

October 2007, Week 2

IOWA-TOPICS@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
IOWA-TOPICS Home IOWA-TOPICS Home
IOWA-TOPICS October 2007, Week 2

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Bt corn damaging stream ecosytems
From:
Tom Mathews <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements
Date:
Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:33:34 EDT
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (6 kB) , text/html (7 kB)
  

This message is very important, especially given the Iowa Chapter's focus  on 
water issues.
Here it is again, without the extraneous text at the top.
Tom

 =============================================================================
=
GM  WATCH daily list
http://www.gmwatch.org
---
---
Transgenic Corn  Found to Damage Stream Ecosystems 
Environmental News  Service, October  11  2007
http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/oct2007/2007-10-11-096.asp

BLOOMINGTON,  Indiana, October 11, 2007 (ENS) - A widely planted variety of 
genetically  engineered corn has the potential to harm aquatic ecosystems, 
finds a new study  by an Indiana University professor of environmental science and 
his colleagues.  

Pollen and other plant parts containing toxins from genetically  engineered 
Bt corn are washing into streams near cornfields and harming a type  of fly 
that is eaten by fish and amphibians, the study demonstrates. 

Bt  corn is engineered to include a gene from the micro-organism Bacillus  
thuringiensis, Bt, which produces a toxin that protects the crop from pests,  
especially the European corn borer. 

The research team led by Todd Royer,  an assistant professor in the Indiana 
University School of Public and  Environmental Affairs, found that consumption 
of Bt corn pollen, leaves and cobs  increased mortality and reduced growth in 
caddisflies, aquatic insects related  to the pests targeted by the toxin in Bt 
corn. 

"Caddisflies," Royer  said, "are a food resource for higher organisms like 
fish and amphibians. And,  if our goal is to have healthy, functioning 
ecosystems, we need to protect all  the parts." 

Caddisfly larvae are an important part of stream ecosystems,  where they help 
control algae populations and provide food for fish and other  creatures.  In 
healthy streams, caddisflies are very common and their cases  are found by 
the hundreds under rocks and logs.

Bt corn was licensed for  use in 1996 and quickly gained popularity. By 2006, 
around 35 percent of corn  acreage planted in the United States was 
genetically modified, the study says,  citing U.S. Department of Agriculture data. 

Before licensing Bt corn,  the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency conducted 
trials to test its impact on  water biota. But it used Daphnia, a crustacean 
often used for toxicity tests,  and not insects that are more closely related 
to the target pests, Royer said.  

"Every new technology comes with some benefits and some risks," he said.  "I 
think probably the risks associated with widespread planting of Bt corn were  
not fully assessed." 

If there are unintended consequences of planting  genetically engineered 
crops, Royer says farmers should not be held responsible.  In a competitive 
agricultural economy, producers have to use the best  technologies they can get, he 
said. 

Funded by the National Science  Foundation, the study is published this week 
by the journal "Proceedings of the  National Academies of Science, PNAS." 

There was a public outcry over the  use of Bt corn in 1999, when a report 
indicated it might harm monarch  butterflies. But studies coordinated by the 
federal Agricultural Research  Service and published in PNAS concluded Bt corn was 
not a significant threat to  monarchs. 

Around that time, Royer said, he and his colleagues wondered  whether the 
toxin from Bt corn was getting into streams near cornfields, and, if  so, whether 
it could have an harmful impact on aquatic insects. 

Their  research, conducted in 2005 and 2006 in an intensely farmed region of 
northern  Indiana, measured inputs of Bt corn pollen, leaves and cobs in 12 
headwater  streams, using litter traps to collect the materials. They also found 
corn  pollen in the guts of caddisflies, showing they were feeding on corn 
pollen.  

In laboratory trials, the researchers found caddisflies that were fed  leaves 
from Bt corn had growth rates that were less than half those of  caddisflies 
fed non-Bt corn litter. They also found that a different type of  caddisfly 
had significantly increased mortality rates when exposed to Bt corn  pollen at 
concentrations between two and three times the maximum found in the  test 
sites. 

Royer said there was considerable variation in the amount of  corn pollen and 
byproducts found at study locations and there is geographical  variation. 
Farmers in Iowa and Illinois, for instance, are planting more Bt corn  than those 
in Indiana. The level of Bt corn pollen associated with increased  mortality 
in caddisflies, he said, "could potentially represent conditions in  streams 
of the western Corn Belt." 

There are four bands of Bt corn seed  available commercially - YieldGard from 
Northrup King (Novartis); YieldGard2  from Monsanto; YieldGard Rootworm from 
Monsanto; and Herculex from Pioneer  DowAgra-Sciences. 

Other crops such as potatoes and cotton also make use  of Bt technology. By 
1999, 29 million acres of Bt corn, potato and cotton were  grown globally. 

When proponents of Bt technology list the benefits, they  often say the Bt 
proteins in the crops will not kill beneficial insects. Royer  and his team 
showed that claim is not accurate in the case of caddisflies.  

Other principal investigators for the study, titled "Toxins in  transgenic 
crop byproducts may affect headwater stream ecosystems," were Emma  
Rosi-Marshall of Loyola University Chicago, Jennifer Tank of the University of  Notre 
Dame, and Matt Whiles of Southern Illinois University.  



----------------------------------------------------------
You  are subscribed as [log in to unmask]
To unsubscribe simply click the link  below:
http://www.gmwatch.org/unsub.asp?ID=1097&sec=pbmhh

This  message has been sent because you subscribed to the GM Watch  List.
http://www.gmwatch.org

------------------------------------------------------------



-  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe  from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message  to:
[log in to unmask]

Check out our  Listserv Lists support site for more  information:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp











************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]

Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp









ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV