The Committee of 12 legislators that has been working on CAFO legislation for
Iowa presented a bill last week. This version of the bill included a lot of
the provisions the Sierra Club thinks are important, including a phosphorus
standard for manure management plans, permit fees to fund the DNR livestock
program, increased setback distances for valuable and vulnerable natural
resources, and air quality monitoring and standards.
Unfortunately, since last Thursday when the bill was released, many groups
are working to weaken the language in the bill. Especially vulnerable seem
to be the provisions for air quality monitoring and standards and the permit
fees to fund DNR regulation of the livestock industry.
SO, this bill needs your help! The Iowa Chapter of the Sierra Club, along
with other environmental and public interest groups, has been supportive of
the process to create MEANINGFUL CAFO legislation. We were pleasantly
surprised at how many good things were included in the first draft of the
bill, although we acknowledged that there were provisions we still want to be
included or strengthened.
The Sierra Club wants to continue to support the legislative process, which
means that we need to let our legislators know that weakening the CAFO bill
is not acceptable. We want real improvements to Iowa's air and water
quality, and it is not clear that the CAFO bill as it stands now will really
do this.
Please call or email your legislators, especially your senator. The Senate
is expected to debate the CAFO bill on the floor on Tuesday, so there is not
much time to let our senators know that:
1) We want a provision in the CAFO bill that allows the DNR to collect fees
from permitted livestock facilities, so that the DNR can assist producers in
the creation and implementation of manure management plans and can monitor
pollution problems created by some of these facilities.
2) We want a provision in the CAFO bill for air quality monitoring and
standards that allows the DNR to continue the rule-making process and takes
into acccount the recommendations made in the report by the Univ. of Iowa and
Iowa State.
Go to www.legis.state.ia.us to find your legislators' names and contact
information.
Please pass this Action Alert to other interested Iowans.
Read further if you want more background information about the CAFO bill.
This information is from Rep. Mark Kuhn.
Bill Highlights
The 12-member group is continuing to meet to fine-tune the details of the
bill. After the committee agrees on all the details, the bill will be filed
as an amendment to Senate File 2293, a shell bill created to give the group
more time to work.
The Senate Agriculture Committee has started discussing the draft proposal.
They have tabled their debate until the 12-member group can make final
changes.
The Senate majority leader said the intent is to get this amendment filed by
the end of the week. At that point, the amendment will be available on the
state's legislative website.
Major highlights of the bill include:
o Air Quality. DNR is required to conduct a comprehensive field study to
monitor the level of airborne pollutants (defined as hydrogen sulfide,
ammonia, or odor) emitted from all animal feeding operations. At this time,
the measuring will be done from the neighbor's residence, church, business,
school, or public use area, not the property line.
o Phosphorus. In addition to nitrogen use levels, DNR is also required to
establish a phosphorus index in order to determine the manner and timing of
the application to a land area of manure originating from a confinement
feeding operation.
o Producer Fees. The bill provides for a long-term, stable funding source
to provide DNR with resources to hire 12 new inspectors to enforce
environmental laws that relate to livestock. The bill sets a variable
compliance fee (cannot exceed 15¢ per animal unit capacity), which will be
paid for by confinement owners who are required to file a manure management
plan.
o Local Community Impact Matrix. Under current law, counties consider
applications for construction permits and may submit comments to DNR. The
bill requires the establishment of a state-developed community impact matrix
based on social and economic factors. Local boards of supervisors can use
this matrix to make an evaluation to DNR on whether a permitted facility
should be built in their county. DNR will have final authority on siting
facilities, based on the community impact matrix and a DNR-developed
environmental impact matrix.
o Separation Distances. The bill basically increases construction
distances by 500 feet for new construction of confinement feeding operation
structures and the expansion of those operations from a neighbor, business,
school, church or public use area. Distances were increased to up to 2,000
feet from a surface intake, wellhead, or cistern of an agricultural drainage
well or known sinkhole; 2,500 feet from a federal or state designated
protected wetland; and 1,000 feet from a major water source or 500 feet from
a non-major water source.
o 100-year Floodplain. The bill prohibits building a confinement feeding
operation structure on land that is part of a 100-year floodplain.
o Restitution for water pollution. The bill clarifies that a person who is
liable for pollution of state waters is also liable to pay restitution to the
State Fish and Game Protection Fund for injury to fish, wildlife, and other
species injured by pollution. DNR is authorized to assess restitution
amounts, including administrative costs to investigating pollution injuries
pursuant to DNR rules. The rules may establish liquidated damages for
certain species within specified limits. Restitution amounts, except amounts
for investigative costs, must be used to fund restoration or improvement of
fisheries.
o Permit Threshold Lowered. Under current law, DNR sets the threshold to
determine who has to get a construction permit. Under the bill, at a
minimum, a confinement feeding operation of at least 1,000 animal units must
obtain a construction permit. As an example, currently a permit is needed
for finishing hog operations of over 4,167 animals. Under this bill, an
operation of 2,500 hogs would need a permit. A small animal feeding
operation (defined as 500 animal units or less) is exempt from the
construction permit requirements and the manure management plan requirements.
o Monitoring Wells. DNR may require that the owner of a confinement
feeding operation install and operate monitoring wells as part of an unformed
(earthen) manure storage structure.
o Prohibits Lowering of Groundwater Table. An unformed (earthen) manure
storage structure is prohibited from being constructed by installing a system
to permanently lower the groundwater table. Current law allows for the
lowering of the groundwater table.
Erin Jordahl
Director, Iowa Chapter Sierra Club
3839 Merle Hay Road, Suite 280
Des Moines, IA 50310
515-277-8868
[log in to unmask]
[log in to unmask]
|