Thanks for the very thoughtful responses to my question.

In regard to the question about weeds and toxic chemicals:  I think there are 
risk/benefit ratios involved with all herbicide use.  In some cases, the 
ecological risks posed by an invasive exotic plant species are considerable, and 
timely one-time use of herbicide on small initial patches can save thousands of 
acres from becoming permanently infested and rendered essentially worthless 
in terms of native biodiversity.  

In other cases, some ecological restoration work can be extremely difficult 
without some careful limited use of herbicide.  Painting cut stumps is one 
example.  At the North American Prairie Conference in Wisconsin last year, a 
wonderful elderly woman who owned a beautiful restored oak savanna warned field 
trip attendees that in some circumstances, cutting invasive woodies without 
treating the stumps is an exercise in futility.  She said, "I tried cutting alone 
for awhile, but I don't have enough years left to keep cutting all those 
resprouts and neither do you."

The issues regarding urban lawns and rowcrops are different, of course.  For 
one thing, herbicide use on lawns and rowcrops is often annual and routine.  

My purpose, when I use herbicide during restoration, is to help create a 
situation in which I won't have to use it in the future.  One reason for the 
(careful) initial use of herbicide in Iowa restoration work is to help overcome the 
effects of decades of fire suppression.  Once that happens, prescribed burns 
can be used instead.

Cindy   

Cindy Hildebrand
[log in to unmask]
Ames, IA  50010

"We landed one time only to let the men geather Pappaws or the Custard apple 
of which this Country abounds, and the men are very fond of."  (William 
Clark)  

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To get off the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]