Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - IOWA-TOPICS Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

IOWA-TOPICS Archives

August 2011, Week 2

IOWA-TOPICS@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
IOWA-TOPICS Home IOWA-TOPICS Home
IOWA-TOPICS August 2011, Week 2

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Water quality--nitrates
From:
laura belin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements
Date:
Mon, 8 Aug 2011 04:25:40 -0700
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2099 bytes) , text/html (2661 bytes)
Not an expert on this, but the Des Moines Water Works does have the largest nitrate removal system in the world.

--- On Fri, 8/5/11, Thomas Mathews <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

From: Thomas Mathews <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Water quality--nitrates
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Friday, August 5, 2011, 10:50 AM



 
 

Here's a central-Iowa water quality question for everyone:
 
If, in the watersheds that Des Moines gets its drinking water 
from--which are mainly the Raccoon River, but also, at certain times, the 
Des Moines River--we went back to farming methods that were in use prior to 
about 1940, which means no applications of anhydrous ammonia, would the Des 
Moines Waterworks need to continue using the major nitrate removal plant which 
they built a few years ago, in order to make our water safe to drink? (I 
remember reading that our nitrate removal facility is the largest of its kind in 
the world.)
 
Thanks for any comments on this!
 
Tom
Des Moines
 
PS--Regarding the objection that 1940s-era farming was much more 
labor-intensive than today, and therefore not a realistic option anymore, 
consider that we have a serious labor surplus now, with unemployment probably 
understated at the official figure of 9.1 percent. 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]

Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp

To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see:
 http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]

Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp

To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see:
 http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp








ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV