Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - IOWA-TOPICS Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

IOWA-TOPICS Archives

December 2003, Week 3

IOWA-TOPICS@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
IOWA-TOPICS Home IOWA-TOPICS Home
IOWA-TOPICS December 2003, Week 3

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 12:32:42 -0600
Reply-To:
"Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Bush Administration Contradicts Itself about Mercury
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
From:
Bill Witt <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (167 lines)
This is good strategy.  The other thing that drew my attention was the
recent Register story about lead-paint exposure of Latino children.  It's
the same story for black children, and indeed any children living in old
and deteriorating low-rent housing.  This is an environmental justice
issue, as well as an economic justice issue.  You can't attract low-wage
labor without low-rent housing, except somebody always has to pick up the
rest of the tab, someday.  Same with polllution.

So, is there a way to develop a common strategy around issues that tie in
the health and future of our children with the health of our environment
and the health of our economy?

--Bill Witt





> Tarah,
>
> I think the Chapter should develop a FACT Sheet and educational
> publication about the danger of mercury and the need in Iowa to track this
> pollution.
>
> I will be happy to help with this development as a volunteer.
> And I think I can raise the money to publish the material when it is
> completed.
>
> At the Governor's Water Summit, the water expert mentioned mercury in one
> sentence of her presentation saying, if I remember right, "we are
> beginning to measure mercury levels in some waters."
>
> Let's take the mercury bull by the horns and be proactive.
>
> Chris Bedford
> [log in to unmask]
> 515-283-0777
>
>       -----Original Message-----
>       From: Tarah Heinzen [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>       Sent: Thu 12/11/2003 5:33 PM
>       To: [log in to unmask]
>       Cc:
>       Subject: FW: Bush Administration Contradicts Itself about Mercury
>
>
>
>       Iowa is one of only 6 states that doesn't have a program to educate the
>       public about the risks of eating mercury contaminated fish, and our
> reliance
>       on coal means this will be a growing public health threat here and
>       elsewhere...
>
>       tarah
>
>       -----Original Message-----
>       From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>       Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 2:07 PM
>       To: [log in to unmask];
>       [log in to unmask];
>       [log in to unmask];
>       [log in to unmask]
>       Subject: Bush Administration Contradicts Itself about Mercury
>
>
>       FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
>       December 10, 2003
>
>       CONTACT:
>       Wendy Balazik, 202-675-2383
>
>       BUSH ADMINISTRATION CONTRADICTS ITSELF
>       While Dismantling Mercury Protections, Administration Cautions Women and
>       Children to Reduce Fish Consumption
>
>       Washington, DC- The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the
>       Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) today expanded health warnings
> about
>       the toxic effects of eating mercury-tainted fish in a draft advisory set
> to
>       be finalized early next year.  This comes on the heels of the Bush
>       administration's recent sweeping changes that would make it easier for
>       polluters to avoid cleaning up mercury.
>
>       Today's action by the FDA and EPA increased the number of fish species
> with
>       unsafe levels of mercury and expanded the list of people who are most
> hurt
>       by mercury, adding children, nursing mothers and women who may become
>       pregnant.
>
>       "It is astonishing that while the Bush administration is warning people
>       about increased health threats from eating mercury-laden fish, it is
>       weakening the very clean air protections that would reduce mercury
>       pollution," said Carl Pope, Sierra Club's executive director.  "Just
> last
>       week, the Bush administration announced a plan to loosen protections for
>       mercury pollution in our air; and today, two federal agencies report
> that
>       more fish than ever have dangerous levels of mercury.   We call on the
> Bush
>       administration to enforce clean air laws that are on the books and
> require
>       power plants to install new technology to control this dangerous
>       pollutant."
>
>       Mercury is a powerful toxin that causes learning and developmental
>       disabilities in children.  Women of childbearing age and people who
>       regularly and frequently eat highly contaminated fish, or even large
>       amounts of moderately contaminated fish, are most likely to be at risk
> from
>       mercury exposure.  Children exposed in the womb or after birth,
> subsistence
>       fisherman and certain Native American populations are at risk.
>
>       Forty-four states have warned the public to limit consumption of fish
> from
>       mercury-contaminated lakes and rivers.  Mercury works its way up the
>       aquatic food chain and into the human body in a toxic form. The threat
> is
>       especially great to the offspring of women who have high levels of
> mercury
>       -- hence the advisories that urge women of child-bearing age and
> children
>       reduce the consumption of some species of fish and avoid others
> completely.
>       One of every dozen of U.S. women of childbearing age has mercury in
> their
>       bodies at levels that could threaten their unborn children.
>
>       Airborne deposits account for the bulk of mercury, which occurs
> naturally
>       in coal and rises out of it as it burns. Regulation has been sought
> under
>       the 1990 Clean Air Act, with a December 15 deadline set for rule-making.
>       The EPA seemed poised to order a 90 percent cutback in mercury emitted
> from
>       coal-powered plants by 2008. Instead, the long-term goal will be a 70
>       percent reduction by 2018, the EPA said last week.  By one estimate,
> that
>       means 300 more tons of mercury coming down with the rain over the next
> 15
>       years.  The EPA's decision to back off of its more stringent pollution
>       control standards is an unacceptable concession to wealthy power
> companies
>       that puts the public's health at risk, Pope said.
>
>       # # #
>
>       Wendy Balazik
>       Media Coordinator
>       Sierra Club
>       Phone:  202-675-2383
>       Fax:  202-547-6009
>
>       - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>       To get off the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
>       [log in to unmask]
>
>
>

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Make your voice heard! Find out how to get Take Action Alerts
and other important Sierra Club messages by email at:
http://www.sierraclub.org/email

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV