Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - IOWA-TOPICS Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

IOWA-TOPICS Archives

February 1999, Week 3

IOWA-TOPICS@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
IOWA-TOPICS Home IOWA-TOPICS Home
IOWA-TOPICS February 1999, Week 3

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
C: Grand Canyon calling again!
From:
jrclark <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements
Date:
Fri, 19 Feb 1999 14:53:33 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (65 lines)
Forwarded from Jane Clark:

----------
> From: Marianne Thaeler <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Fwd:Please distribute -- Grand Canyon calling again!
> Date: Friday, February 19, 1999 2:45 AM
>
> ____________________Forward Header_____________________
> Subject:    Please distribute -- Grand Canyon calling again!
> Author: Rob Smith
> Date:       2/18/99 12:00 PM
>
> IS THIS THE GRAND CANYON NATIONAL FOREST?
>
>      Cutting 8000 trees, some up to 16 inches in diameter, hauling
> them away with logging trucks, and widening backwoods roads.  Is
> this what we expect at Grand Canyon National Park?
>
>      Even more, is this what should be allowed in a proposed park
> wilderness area?
>
>      The National Park Service wants to restore a natural fire
> cycle to the Grand Canyon rim, but years of fire suppression and
> past grazing have allowed too many small trees to grow to a point
> that wildfire might burn up too much of the forest.
>
>      Some thinning is needed, they say, to restore historic
> conditions for low-level grass fires to periodically cleanse the
> forest of underbrush without torching all of the big trees.
>
>      So far, so good.  But one of four alternatives in the Park
> Service's proposed wildfire experiment requires removal of
> commercial-sized logs with chainsaws and logging trucks.  One of
> two sites for this experiment is within a North Rim forest proposed
> by the Park Service for wilderness preservation.
>
>      "We're simply not going to allow trading Smokey the Bear for
> Paul Bunyan inside Grand Canyon National Park," said Sharon
> Galbreath, Grand Canyon chapter conservation chair.  "And logging
> within a proposed wilderness area is an idea which needs to be
> dropped pronto!"
>
>      The Park Service is taking comments on their proposed
> experiment until March 24.
>
>      Please tell them to stay out of the wilderness altogether;
> they can and should learn how to thin the forest on less sensitive
> lands.  And tell them to focus on thinning small trees, not logging
> big ones, inside this premier national park.
>
>      Comments can be emailed to [[log in to unmask]],
> or write to Grand Canyon National Park, attn: Wildlife Biologist,
> PO Box 129, Grand Canyon, AZ 86023.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> To get off the CONS-WPST-FORESTS-FED-FORUM list, send email to
[log in to unmask]
> Make the message text (not the subject): SIGNOFF
CONS-WPST-FORESTS-FED-FORUM

-----------------------------------------------------------------
To get off the IOWA-TOPICS list, send email to [log in to unmask]
Make the message text (not the subject): SIGNOFF IOWA-TOPICS 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV