Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - IOWA-TOPICS Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

IOWA-TOPICS Archives

February 2001, Week 3

IOWA-TOPICS@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
IOWA-TOPICS Home IOWA-TOPICS Home
IOWA-TOPICS February 2001, Week 3

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Endangered Species Act
From:
Jack Eastman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Sat, 17 Feb 2001 14:47:11 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (904 bytes) , text/html (1146 bytes)
One environmental order by the Clinton administration is likely to go
unchallenged by the Bush administration:  The decision last fall by
the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service not to add any more animals or
plants to the endangered species list until at least the end of this
year.  The agency said that it had to make the move because of a
budget crisis and that fighting off lawsuits by environmentalists was
contributing to the monetary shortfall.  The moved infuriated
enviros, but their complaints are likely to fall on deaf ears in the
current administration.  Jasper Carlton of the Biodiversity Legal
Foundation says his conservative estimate is that 6,000 species
warrant protection under the Endangered Species Act, 4,500 more than
are currently on the list.

straight to the source:  Christian Science Monitor, Todd Wilkinson, 16
Feb 2001
<http://www.csmonitor.com/durable/2001/02/16/p2s2.htm>

(Bold my addition, JE)


ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV