| Sender: |
|
| X-To: |
|
| Date: |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 14:42:00 -0700 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Content-Type: |
multipart/related; boundary="0-1889986026-1154641320=:26853" |
| From: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Try the e-mail addresses listed below instead of the
previously sent addresses to express your support for
the DNR director's discretionary rule.
I-CALL Alert
>
> Tell the Iowa Legislative Administrative Rules
> Review Committee we need
> the Water Protection Rule!
>
> (also known as the Discretionary Rule)
>
>
>
> Overview: Currently, if all state minimum
> requirements are met, the
> Department of Natural Resources MUST issue a new
> permit to any new or
> expanding animal feeding operation. In June, the
> Environmental
> Protection Commission passed what is known as the
> Water Protection or
> Discretionary Rule. This new rule, which received
> extensive public input
> through meetings and comments, gives the Department
> Natural Resources
> ability and authority to become a final backstop to
> a proposed animal
> feeding operation in special cases to protect Iowa's
> public waters.
>
>
>
> This rule will come before the legislative
> Administrative Rules Review
> Committee (ARRC) on Tuesday, August 8th, at around
> 1:00 pm. We know
> there is considerable opposition pressuring ARRC
> members to stop the
> rule. Yet what is best for the environment and best
> for Iowa is for the
> DNR to have the authority described in the rule and
> for ARRC to give the
> rule a chance to work.
>
>
>
> Action Requested: Please contact any or all members
> of the
> Administrative Rules Review Committee and let them
> know you support the
> Water Protection Rule (Discretionary Rule) as it
> currently stands
> (labeled ARC 5243B.)
>
>
>
> Key talking points:
>
>
>
> *Our state has made a turning point when it comes to
> protecting and
> investing in our public waters, and this rule is a
> fair and reasonable
> method to protect that investment.
>
>
>
> *Permitting requirements cannot completely eliminate
> the need for expert
> judgment. This rule would give the DNR the ability
> to use their expert
> judgment to determine if a facility should receive a
> permit in special
> cases-where the unique situation is not described in
> code/specs.
>
>
>
> *The DNR review would consider common-sense factors
> such as the
> proximity and likely impact to environmentally
> sensitive areas such as
> lakes or karst terrain, the spreading of manure on
> steep slopes (highly
> erodible land), or the likelihood of impact to a
> public water supply.
>
>
>
> *This rule would apply to less than 1% of the new
> permits, and would
> only be used if significant danger of pollution is
> evident and likely.
>
>
>
> Please Contact one or more of the following ARRC
> committee members...
>
> Senator Jack Kibbie
> [log in to unmask]
> 712-852-4140
>
> Senator Mike Connolly
> [log in to unmask]
> 563-556-6217
>
> Senator Tom Courtney
> [log in to unmask]
> 319-753-2684
>
> Senator Paul McKinley
> [log in to unmask]
> 641-774-5784
>
> Senator James Seymour
> [log in to unmask]
> 712-647-2699
>
> Rep. George Eichorn
> [log in to unmask]
> 515-838-2277
>
> Rep. Danny Carroll
> [log in to unmask]
> 641-236-7043
>
> Rep. Marcie Frevert
> [log in to unmask]
> 712-852-4950
>
> Rep. Dave Heaton
> [log in to unmask]
> 319-385-9342
>
> Rep. Geri Huser
> [log in to unmask]
> 515-967-7846
>
>
>
> Thank you for taking action on behalf of our natural
> resources!
>
>
>
> Lynn Laws
>
> I-CALL Coordinator
>
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To get off the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|