For you info-Phyllis Mains
From ArcticWild Update # 218, June 04, 2004
BP: "ARCTIC DRILLING NOT PART OF CURRENT BUSINESS PLAN"
In a victory for a campaign to persuade the London-based oil giant to
stay out of sensitive and protected areas, BP Chairman Peter Sutherland
announced at its annual general meeting in April that drilling in the
Arctic Wildlife Refuge is "not part of its current business plan."
"Drilling in the Arctic Refuge doesn't make sense from an environmental
standpoint and the company's announcement today shows that BP recognizes
that it doesn't make good business sense either," said U.S. PIRG Arctic
Campaign Director Athan Manuel. "We hope that we can build on a
productive annual meeting and develop a long-term no-go zone policy for
sensitive areas."
Manuel and the Right Reverend Mark MacDonald of the Episcopal Diocese of
Alaska presented the resolution at Thursday's annual general meeting. The
resolution, filed by a trans-Atlantic coalition of environmentalists,
religious organizations, and socially responsible investors, directs BP
to report on the risks associated with operating in sensitive and
protected areas such as World Heritage Sites, IUCN categories, and
national parks, monuments, and wildlife refuges. More than six percent of
BP shareholders voted in favor of the resolution.
"For centuries, the Christian moral tradition and the Western legal
tradition have consistently promoted aboriginal rights as fundamental
elements of basic and minimal commitment to justice," said Reverend
MacDonald. "Though these traditions are accepted almost unanimously in
theory, government, corporations and sadly, even religious institutions
have far too consistently undermined or stolen capacity for aboriginal
peoples to survive," he concluded.
The Special Resolution, drafted by the U.S. Public Interest Research
Group (U.S. PIRG) Education Fund in December 2003, was co-filed by a
broad coalition of environmental, financial, and religious groups, along
with over 90 individual investors. This year's lead co-filers include the
Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust, the Sierra Club, Clean Yield Asset
Management, and some members of Ecumenical Council for Corporate
Responsibility, including the Congregation of La Retraite.
"Today's vote sends a strong message to BP that the best way for the
company to go beyond petroleum is to stay out of protected areas like the
Arctic Refuge," said U.S. PIRG's Athan Manuel. "Adopting a no-go zones
policy will make BP the industry leader on environmental issues and
corporate responsibility."
In the last five years, the PIRG Arctic Wilderness Campaign has targeted
oil companies that have an interest in drilling in the Arctic Refuge.
ConocoPhillips shareholders will vote a similar resolution on May 5,
2004. The campaign has filed 14 shareholder resolutions and generated
more than 50,000 e-mail, phone calls, and letters to BP, ConocoPhillips,
ExxonMobil and ChevronTexaco.
For more on the campaign visit www.savethearctic.com.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Make your voice heard! Find out how to get Take Action Alerts
and other important Sierra Club messages by email at:
http://www.sierraclub.org/email
|
