Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - IOWA-TOPICS Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

IOWA-TOPICS Archives

October 2007, Week 3

IOWA-TOPICS@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
IOWA-TOPICS Home IOWA-TOPICS Home
IOWA-TOPICS October 2007, Week 3

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
"Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Genetically Engineered Corn May Harm Stream Ecosystems
From:
Jim H Clark <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:23:41 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Jim H Clark <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (128 lines)
Forwarded by Jane Clark

National Science Foundation

Genetically Engineered Corn May Harm Stream Ecosystems - US National Science 
Foundation
(NSF)http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=110265&org=NSF&from=news

Ecological impacts of genetically engineered corn are particularly important 
because of increased corn demand created by biofuels production

Genetically modified corn detritus and pollen affect non-target organisms 
downstream.

October 9, 2007

A new study indicates that a popular type of genetically engineered 
corn--called Bt corn--may damage the ecology of streams draining Bt corn 
fields in ways that have not been previously considered by regulators. The 
study, which was funded by the National Science Foundation, appears in the 
Oct. 8 edition of  The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

This study provides the first evidence that toxins from Bt corn may travel 
long distances in streams and may harm stream insects that serve as food for 
fish. These results compound concerns about the ecological impacts of Bt 
corn raised by previous studies showing that corn-grown toxins harm 
beneficial insects living in the soil.

Licensed for use in 1996, Bt corn is engineered to produce a toxin that 
protects against pests, particularly the European corn borer. Bt corn now 
accounts for approximately 35 percent of corn acreage in the U.S., and its 
use is increasing.

"As part of the licensing process for genetically modified crops, the U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was responsible for testing and 
identifying potential environmental consequences from the planting of Bt 
corn," says Jennifer Tank, who is from the University of Notre Dame and is a 
member of the team studying Bt corn.

To fulfill this requirement, EPA completed studies that assumed that plant 
parts would remain in fields without being carried away by streams draining 
agricultural lands, says Tank. In addition, EPA only tested the impacts of 
Bt corn on smalllakeorganisms that are typically used to test the impacts of 
chemicals on aquatic ecosystems.

The agency did not evaluate the impacts of Bt corn on organisms that live 
instreams--even though Midwest agricultural lands where Bt corn is grown are 
heavily intersected by streams draining the landscape. But despite the 
limitations of its tests, EPA concluded that Bt corn "is not likely to have 
any measurable effects on aquatic invertebrates."

To more comprehensively evaluate the ecological impacts of Bt corn than did 
the EPA, the research team did the following:

1. Measured the entry of Bt plant parts--including pollen, leaves and 
cobs--in 12 streams in a heavily farmed Indiana region. The research team's 
results demonstrate that these plant parts are washing into local steams. 
Moreover, during storms, these plant parts are carried long distances and 
therefore could have ecological impacts on downstream water bodies, such as 
lakes and large rivers.

2. Collected field data indicating that Bt corn pollen is being eaten by 
caddisflies, which are close genetic relatives of the targeted Bt pests. 
Todd V. Royer, a member of the research team from Indiana University, says 
that caddisflies "provide a food resource for higher organisms like fish and 
amphibians."

3. Conducted laboratory tests showing that consumption of Bt corn byproducts 
increased the mortality and reduced the growth of caddisflies. Together with 
field data indicating that the caddisflies are eating Bt corn pollen, these 
results "suggest that the toxin in Bt corn pollen and detritus can affect 
species of insects other than the targeted pest," Tank said.

Royer says that "if our goal is to have healthy, functioning ecosystems, we 
need to protect all the parts. Water resources are something we depend on 
greatly."

"Overall, our study points to the potential for unintended and unexpected 
consequences from the widespread planting of genetically engineered crops," 
Tank said. "The exact extent to which aquatic ecosystems are, or will be, 
impacted is still unknown and likely will depend on a variety of factors, 
such as current ecological conditions, agricultural practices and 
climate/weather patterns."

James Raich, a National Science Foundation program director, adds that 
"increased use of corn for ethanol is leading to increased demand for corn 
and increased acreage in corn production. Previous concerns about the 
nutrient enrichment of streams that accompany mechanized row-crop 
agriculture are now compounded by toxic corn byproducts that enter our 
streams and fisheries, and do additional harm."

The Bt corn researchers stress that their study should not be viewed as an 
indictment of farmers."We do not imply that farmers are somehow to blame for 
planting Bt corn, nor are they responsible for any unintended ecological 
consequences from Bt corn byproducts," Tank said. "Farmers are, to a large 
extent, required to use the latest technological advances in order to stay 
competitive and profitable in the current agro-industrial system."

Media Contacts
Cheryl Dybas, National Science Foundation (703) [log in to unmask]
William Gilroy, University of Notre Dame (574) [log in to unmask]

Program Contacts
James Raich, National Science Foundation (703) [log in to unmask]

Co-Investigators
Todd V. Royer, Indiana University (812) 855-097   [log in to unmask]
Jennifer Tank, University of Notre Dame (574) 631-3976   [log in to unmask]
Matt Whiles, Southern Illionois University
(618)453-7639    [log in to unmask]
Emma J. Rosi-Marshall, Loyola University-Chicago (773)508-8859 
[log in to unmask]

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is an independent federal agency that 
supports fundamental research and education across all fields of science and 
engineering, with an annual budget of $5.92 billion. NSF funds reach all 50 
states through grants to over 1,700 universities and institutions. Each 
year, NSF receives about 42,000 competitive requests for funding, and makes 
over 10,000 new funding awards. The NSF also awards over $400 million in 
professional and service contracts yearly.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]

Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV