"Consumers don't want GM crops and the environment certainly doesn't need
them. It's time this ailing industry was put to bed."


Subj:   GMW: Campaigners dismiss 'safe GM' report
Date:   11/30/2004 2:48:53 AM Central Standard Time
From:    [log in to unmask] (GM WATCH)
Sender:    [log in to unmask] (GM WATCH)
To:    [log in to unmask] ([log in to unmask])




GM WATCH daily
htttp://www.gmwatch.org
------
link to report at end
------
Campaigners dismiss 'safe GM' report
Jeremy Lennard and agencies
The Guardian, November  29, 2004
http://www.guardian.co.uk/gmdebate/Story/0,2763,1362276,00.html

Environmental organisations reacted angrily today to claims that a newly
published study on genetically modified crops in Britain presented no evidence
that they harm the environment.

One of the report's principal claims - that GM crops do not deplete the soil
of weed seeds needed by many birds and other wildlife - was flawed by the
compilers' own admission that their test's "severely reduced" sensitivity meant
that some differences between GM and non-GM trails may have been missed,
according to Friends of the Earth.

The Botanical and Rotational Implications of Genetically Modified Herbicide
Tolerance (Bright) project was carried out by a group of research and
industrial partners coordinated by Jeremy Sweet of the National Institute of
Agricultural Botany. Over a four-year period, it grew sugar beet and oilseed rape
genetically modified to be resistant to herbicides in rotation with cereal crops and
compared the results with conventional sugar beet and oil seed rape grown in
the same rotation.

Bright's aim was to mimic normal agricultural practice and measure how GM
crops performed in a crop rotation.

"Our research indicates that there was no long-term difference in weed
populations in field areas using these GM and non-GM crops. In addition, growing GM
herbicide-tolerant crops could provide farmers with the flexibility to improve
plant diversity by only controlling weeds when they are competing with the
crop," said Dr Sweet.

Friends of the Earth's GM campaigner, Emily Diamand, said the results
appeared to confirm fears that if released commercially GM crops would be difficult
to control and would cross-pollinate with non-GM crops, which would pose a
"real threat" of contamination for conventional varieties.

"Conventional oilseed rape would be threatened with GM contamination, and GM
'superweeds' could add to problems for farmers. It is little wonder that GM
food and crops are so unpopular," Ms Diamand said.

Greenpeace also criticised the findings of the Bright project, which was
sponsored by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), the
Scottish executive's environment and rural affairs department, Britain's
national cereal growing association and five biotech companies.

"Much more extensive trials have shown these GM crops are bad for UK wildlife
and no amount of small-scale tests are going to change the fact that, in the
real world, GM crop contamination is inevitable," Doug Parr, the
organisation's chief scientist, said.

"It's virtually impossible for farmers in Canada to grow organic oilseed rape
because of contamination, while in the USA GM crops have seen farmers
spraying more herbicides on GM herbicide-tolerant crops even though the first claims
were that there would be less.

"Consumers don't want GM crops and the environment certainly doesn't need
them. It's time this ailing industry was put to bed."

Friends of the Earth said the new research should offer little comfort to the
biotech industry, adding that any suggestion it could be used to push the
case for GM commercialisation would be "clutching at GM straws".

The chairman of the Bright project management committee, Windsor Griffiths,
said the report would benefit government policy makers not just in Britain but
across Europe.

"This four-year research project has shown clearly the benefits and
limitations of GM herbicide-tolerant crops when grown in rotation with non-GM crops.
The knowledge we have accumulated will be very useful for providing guidance for
growers of these crops, should they be commercialised," he said.

The report's findings were welcomed by a Defra spokesman who said the results
would be "considered carefully".

"The report will be forwarded to the Advisory Committee on Releases to the
Environment [Acre] for consideration and we expect Acre will publish its advice
on the report next spring," he said.

"While this report is important and will be considered carefully, the
earliest possible date for the cultivation of GM herbicide-tolerant crops in the UK
is 2008," he added.

In September, a survey showed public attitudes to GM foods were hardening.
Some 61% of people polled on behalf of the consumer magazine Which? said they
were concerned about the use of GM material in food production - up from 56% in
2002.

Report's findings:
http://www.hgca.com/publications/documents/cropresearch/BRIGHT_1-4_.pdf


----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as [log in to unmask]
To unsubscribe simply click the link below:
http://www.gmwatch.org/unsub.asp?ID=1097&sec=pbmhh

This message has been sent because you subscribed to the GM Watch List.
http://www.gmwatch.org


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see:
 http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp