Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - IOWA-TOPICS Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

IOWA-TOPICS Archives

January 2003, Week 2

IOWA-TOPICS@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
IOWA-TOPICS Home IOWA-TOPICS Home
IOWA-TOPICS January 2003, Week 2

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: environment
From:
Pam Mackey-Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements
Date:
Thu, 9 Jan 2003 21:53:46 EST
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2708 bytes) , text/html (3354 bytes)
Several weeks ago I picked up a phone call that happened to be someone doing
a survey on the political issues.  Usually I don't answer those surveys, but
this time I did.  The survey taker started by listing several of the "top
political issues" and asked me to pick the top 3.  I picked 2 and said the
environment was my third even though the environment was not one of the items
on the list.

I could hear the person typing my answer.  Then she proceeded with the
issues, asking questions.  She had a spot for the environment.  It was
obvious that the survey designers had allowed for an unprompted odd answer
like mine and she was ready.

Perhaps this would work on other surveys.

Those "crazy" survey results are slanted by who is willing to answer the
survey and how they choose to answer the questions.  This might be one way of
getting the environment on the agenda.

Pam

------------------------------

----------------------------

In a message dated 1/8/2003 5:46:32 PM Central Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:


> Good idea Glenn.  Why not pose this question to our legislators and the
> citizens they represent in a letter to the editor..or better yet a 'Guest
> Opinion' in the D.M. Register as the session opens?
> Cathy L.
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Glenn Pollock" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 11:15 PM
> Subject: environment
>
>
> > The polls in Iowa and other states indicate  that the environment is not a
> > high priority among voters but are we asking the question correctly. What
> > if we ask?, Do you want clean water , to drink , to swim in , to boat in
> > and fish. Do we want close by parks and preserve to visit. Do you want
> wild
> > life to view and hunt. Do you want clean air that does not stink of hog
> > manure , air that is safe to breathe. Do you want clean streets and roads
> > not littered with cans and trash. I bet we would get a lot different
> answer
> > then are you interested in the environment.
> > I thing when the general people think of the environment they think of
> some
> > guy that  has lashed himself to a tree in Oregon. Or that  the cost of
> > lumber going up because of an owl. They think gas cost too much because we
> > are not drilling for oil in Alaska. Or that they will lose their job
> > because of new environmental regulations. They are simply not aware of
> > environmental problems since they spend most of there time working and
> > raising  kids.  And a few that science can fix any problem if it gets out
> > of hand.
> >
> > Glenn Pollock
>



- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see:
 http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp


ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV