Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - IOWA-TOPICS Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

IOWA-TOPICS Archives

July 2001, Week 3

IOWA-TOPICS@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
IOWA-TOPICS Home IOWA-TOPICS Home
IOWA-TOPICS July 2001, Week 3

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Loess Hills Update
From:
Debbie Neustadt <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements
Date:
Tue, 17 Jul 2001 15:47:00 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
I talked with Rich Bender regarding this on June 6. Rich Bender works for
Senator Harkin in D.C. He told me that Senator Harkin was very interested in
persuing this kind of funding. He also expressed disapointment in the Park
Service not
wanting to recommend park status.

Jane Clark wrote:

> Did you see the article in the paper the other day about Harkin and Grassley
> asking for $ to study the 12 special areas for protection?  It was page 4 of
> the Metro & Iowa section of the Des Moines Register on Saturday, July 14.
>
> Hills study approved
>
> Preservation efforts in the Loess Hills in western Iowa have moved a step
> further.
>
> Senators..........obtained authorization for a study of 12 special landscape
> areas in the Loess Hills in an Interior approp. bill approved this week
> (last week) by the Senate.  The NPS would need to report back to Congress on
> this study by Jan. 15.  The report is supposed to recommend how these areas
> could be preserved.
>
> The Senate bill must be reconciled with a House bill that does not include
> the Loess Hills language.
>
> *article also mentions that the current study is expected to recommend
> against park designation.
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> To get off the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
> [log in to unmask]

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To get off the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV