| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:41:25 -0600 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Type: |
text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 |
| From: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The way these things often go, we probably won't get a look at the
amendment until just before it's distributed at the start of debate.
LUndby's concern about Greiner introducing an "even worse" bill if the
Senate doesn't act belies the point that Greiner could also try to amend
the bill that would come over from the Senate. "Damned if you do, damned
if you don't" with the Lady from Keota.
Bill
> Mary Lundby told me last Monday that there would be a massive amendment to
> the water quality bill filed this week. She said the amendment had been
> approved by DNR, IEC and the wastewater people. If that amendment has
> been filed,
> Lyle, can you send it to us or give us the link? I believe our position
> on the
> bill would still be the same, however.
>
> Mary also told me that she was concerned that if the Senate did not pass a
> bill that could be sent to the House, Sandy Greiner would introduce an
> even
> worse bill in the House.
>
> Wally Taylor
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see:
> http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp
>
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp
|
|
|