| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Thu, 6 Dec 2007 15:21:28 -0600 |
| Content-Disposition: |
inline |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" |
| From: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Excellent letter.
Quoting Neila Seaman <[log in to unmask]>:
>
>
> December 6, 2007
>
> EDITORIAL
>
> It's hard to believe the No. 1 pork-producing state in the nation
> doesn't already know which odor-control practices work best and are
> most cost-effective.That's apparently the case, however, since a
> state task force is recommending the 2008 Legislature spend $23
> million to gather more information about best practices for hog,
> poultry and cattle facilities. Several hundred farms will be test
> sites on a voluntary basis over five years. Producers will share the
> cost for some of this applied research. "Part of the solution is to
> have this additional data," said Wendy Wintersteen, Iowa State
> University's agriculture dean.
>
> http://www.desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071206/OPINION03/712060360/1035/Opinion
>
>
>
> LTE
> CAFOs shouldn't qualify for conservation money
>
> Congress has long resisted putting meaningful caps on crop-subsidy
> payments, resulting in 1 percent of producers currently getting 25
> percent of subsidies. Now there is a move afoot to funnel USDA
> conservation money to owners of large concentrated animal feeding
> operations (CAFOs) ("Fight Rises on Conservation Money," Nov. 18
> Philip Brasher column).Large CAFOs are required by law to build
> appropriate pollution-control structures. To pay them to do what the
> law requires is a waste of conservation money.A better use of
> limited conservation money is for Congress to fund the Conservation
> Security Program, which has a payment limit of $45,000, rather than
> funding CAFOs at up to $450,000 each through the Environmental
> Quality Incentives Program.Brasher quotes livestock producer John
> Hall as saying "it will stimulate investment out here in the
> country." But, do we really want more CAFOs paid for by our tax
> dollars?- Francis Thicke,Fairfield.
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> To unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
> [log in to unmask]
>
> Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
> http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp
>
> To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see:
> http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]
Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp
To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp
|
|
|