Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - IOWA-TOPICS Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

IOWA-TOPICS Archives

December 2007, Week 1

IOWA-TOPICS@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
IOWA-TOPICS Home IOWA-TOPICS Home
IOWA-TOPICS December 2007, Week 1

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: in today's DMRegister
From:
Bill Witt <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements
Date:
Thu, 6 Dec 2007 15:21:28 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (73 lines)
Excellent letter.



Quoting Neila Seaman <[log in to unmask]>:

>
>
> December 6, 2007
>
> EDITORIAL
>
> It's hard to believe the No. 1 pork-producing state in the nation   
> doesn't already know which odor-control practices work best and are   
> most cost-effective.That's apparently the case, however, since a   
> state task force is recommending the 2008 Legislature spend $23   
> million to gather more information about best practices for hog,   
> poultry and cattle facilities. Several hundred farms will be test   
> sites on a voluntary basis over five years. Producers will share the  
>  cost for some of this applied research. "Part of the solution is to  
>  have this additional data," said Wendy Wintersteen, Iowa State   
> University's agriculture dean.
>
> http://www.desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071206/OPINION03/712060360/1035/Opinion
>
>
>
> LTE
> CAFOs shouldn't qualify for conservation money
>
> Congress has long resisted putting meaningful caps on crop-subsidy   
> payments, resulting in 1 percent of producers currently getting 25   
> percent of subsidies. Now there is a move afoot to funnel USDA   
> conservation money to owners of large concentrated animal feeding   
> operations (CAFOs) ("Fight Rises on Conservation Money," Nov. 18   
> Philip Brasher column).Large CAFOs are required by law to build   
> appropriate pollution-control structures. To pay them to do what the  
>  law requires is a waste of conservation money.A better use of   
> limited conservation money is for Congress to fund the Conservation   
> Security Program, which has a payment limit of $45,000, rather than   
> funding CAFOs at up to $450,000 each through the Environmental   
> Quality Incentives Program.Brasher quotes livestock producer John   
> Hall as saying "it will stimulate investment out here in the   
> country." But, do we really want more CAFOs paid for by our tax   
> dollars?- Francis Thicke,Fairfield.
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> To unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
> [log in to unmask]
>
> Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
> http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp
>
> To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see:
>  http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]

Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp

To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see:
 http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV