| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements |
| Date: | Mon, 2 Apr 2001 15:50:09 -0500 |
| Content-Type: | text/plain |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
----------forwarded message----------
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001
To: [log in to unmask]
THE DEADLINE has been EXTENDED to May 3, 2001
FDA has released inadequate "proposed" rules re: genetically engineered
foods (GEFs). Comments are needed.
Comment electronically at: http://www.foodsafetynow.org
Hit " Take Action Now"
or write to:
Docket No. 00N-1396 & Docket No. 00D-1598
FDA Commissioner, Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305)
Food and Drug Administration
5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061
Rockville, MD 20852
SAMPLE LETTER
Genetic engineering involves manipulations of genes between different
species and allows scientists to bypass the natural barriers which protect
the genetic integrity of species. Foods containing or produced from genetic
engineering can cause allergic responses, be toxic, have lowered
nutritional value and/or compromise immune responses in consumers.
Likewise, genetically engineered crops can have unpredictable, irreversible
changes to the environment.
FDA's proposal for companies to voluntary consult with FDA concerning the
safety of their foods is totally inadequate. FDA must require mandatory
pre-market safety testing.
FDA's proposed rule that environmental review procedures be exempt under
the National Environmental Policy Act does not protect the environment.
FDA must require mandatory pre-market environmental review.
FDA's proposed rule makes all labeling of genetically engineered foods
(GEFs) only voluntary. This does not protect my right-to-know or allow me
consumer choice to protect my family and the environment. Voluntary
labeling unfairly reverses the financial burden onto producers who do not
use GEFs. Mandatory labeling is essential for the traceability of GEF
products throughout the food supply for health professionals. Mandatory
labeling also protects overseas markets for farmers. FDA must require
mandatory labeling of GEFs.
FDA's proposed rule is unlikely to provide the public with adequate
information on GEFs for independent review.
The FDA notes that producers of GEFs may claim that any such information,
including the premarket notification,
is trade secret or confidential business information subject to exemption
from public disclosure requirements. FDA must require full disclosure.
All GEFs should be taken off supermarket shelves until mandatory safety
testing and labeling of all GEFs, pre-market environmental review, and full
disclosure are established.
Signed and dated
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To get off the CONS-SPST-BIOTECH-FORUM list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]
----------
Posted by:
----------
Ericka Dana
Organic Consumers Association Regional Coordinator
http://www.purefood.org
<[log in to unmask]>
Sierra Club Iowa Chapter Executive Committee
http://www.sierraclub.org/chapters/ia/
Managing Editor, Iowa City Area Sierra Club News
Iowa City Area Sierra Club Executive Committee
http://www.sierraclub.org/chapters/ia/icag/
Iowa Green Party Agriculture Committee
Director, Midwest Anti-Drift Coalition
http://www.IowaFarmer.com/000617/drift2.htm
http://www.StopDrift.org (under construction)
----------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To get off the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|