Yes, the 10 per year was for chemical testing.  Sorry about the confusion.

Peggy

At 11:05 AM 3/7/2002 , you wrote:
>Note:
>
>There are limits on the biological / benthic invertebrate testing -- which
>definitely showed be fewer than 10 per year (I think it's three). I wonder
>if Mr. Olson was referring to the chemical/physical tests needing to
>number at least 10 to be useful.
>
>BEcky
>-----Original Message-----
>From:         Jane Clark <[log in to unmask]>
>Date:         Thu, 7 Mar 2002 10:00:29 -0800
>To:           [log in to unmask]
>Subject:      Re: Something of interest to IOWATER monitors
>
>
> > Peggy -- is there a limit to how many samples may be taken per month from a
> > particular stream or monitoring site?
> >
> > Jane Clark
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Peggy Murdock <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 6:59 AM
> > Subject: Something of interest to IOWATER monitors
> >
> >
> > > FYI - At the conference on Agriculture and the Environment, John Olson of
> > > the Iowa DNR said that the department has to have at least 10 samples per
> > > year in order to use data.  If you are an IOWATER volunteer, you will
> > > probably have to get out to your stream and crack some ice in the winter
> > in
> > > order to have enough data to satisfy this requirement.
> > >
> > > Peggy Murdock
> >
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > For SC email list T-and-C, send: GET TERMS-AND-CONDITIONS.CURRENT
> > to [log in to unmask]
> >
>
>--
>
>
>Becky Soglin
>[log in to unmask]
>
>319 351-6410
>Iowa City, Iowa
>
>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>For SC email list T-and-C, send: GET TERMS-AND-CONDITIONS.CURRENT
>to [log in to unmask]

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To get off the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]