Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - IOWA-TOPICS Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

IOWA-TOPICS Archives

August 2002, Week 1

IOWA-TOPICS@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
IOWA-TOPICS Home IOWA-TOPICS Home
IOWA-TOPICS August 2002, Week 1

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Fast Track
From:
Jane Clark <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements
Date:
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 18:27:45 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (47 lines)
The House of Representatives caved to big business last week by passing fast
track trade legislation.

Thanks to Congressman Leonard Boswell, the only Iowan in the House of
Representatives who voted against Fast Track.

Vote count
                            YEAS NAYS
REPUBLICAN     190     27
DEMOCRATIC     25   183
INDEPENDENT               2
TOTALS              215   212

July 29, 2002
Sierra Club Expresses Disappointment as House Approves Fast Track,
Threatening Environmental Protections

The Sierra Club expressed strong disappointment after the House of
Representatives narrowly approved dangerous trade legislation. By a
razor-thin margin of 215-212, and only after a rare lobbying visit to
Capitol Hill by President Bush, the House passed the fast track bill, which
will prevent Congress from fixing future trade deals, even when they
threaten the environment.

"Now more than ever, Americans want Congress to hold corporations
accountable, not give them more breaks," said Carl Pope, Executive Director
of the Sierra Club.  "The House's capitulation to powerful business
interests could jeopardize many of the environmental protections Americans
take for granted."

Fast track will allow the Bush administration to extend NAFTA across the
western hemisphere.  Provisions in NAFTA allow foreign corporations to sue
the U.S. government whenever they feel that our environmental protections
affect their profits.  Already, a Canadian chemical company has used NAFTA
to sue the US government for $1 billion, jeopardizing a vital California
clean water law.  Extending NAFTA would greatly increse the number of these
claims, and threaten crucial environmental and public health laws.

Rejecting fast track would not have limited our ability to enter
international trade agreements.  It simply would have allowed Congress to
weigh in on those agreements, to prevent them from running roughshod over
the environment.  That safeguard no longer exists.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To get off the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV