Does Sen. Harkin support including irradiated food in the organic standard? If
so, that would be analogous to this issue and the question is a good one. Is
that what he has pushed for?
Eric G. Hurley
> So why does Harkin support food irradiation??
> Tom Mathews
>
> In a message dated 03-02-26 10:56:39 EST, you write:
>
> << why am I not surprised?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Debbie Neustadt" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:38 PM
> Subject: Harkin Press Release on Organic Legislation
>
>
> > FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
> > Contact: Bill Burton
> > February 26, 2003
> > 202-224-3652
> >
> > HARKIN PROMOTES LEGISLATION TO
> > REVERSE WEAKENING OF ORGANIC LABEL
> >
> > A bipartisan group of Senators, including Tom Harkin (D-IA), is
> > introducing a bill today that would repeal a rider to the recent
> > omnibus appropriations bill that created a broad exemption to
> > the feed requirements for organic animal production. This rider
> > would allow animal products (meat, eggs, dairy) to carry the
> > organic label even without the use of organic feed, unless USDA
> > can prove that organic feed is commercially available for less
> > than twice the price of conventional feed.
> >
> >
> >
> > The last-minute rider was never debated in either house, although
> > it effectively guts the livestock requirements set by the
> > National Organic Program by allowing livestock fed conventional
> > feed to be labeled as "organic". The bipartisan bill being
> > introduced today would undo this rider.
> >
> >
> >
> > "Since consumers are willing to pay a premium for
> > organically-fed meat and poultry, why should Congress
> > deny them what they want by devaluing the organic label?"
> > asked Harkin.
> >
> >
> >
> > This feed exemption would be tremendously damaging
> > to the organic industry which is the fastest-growing segment of
> > American agriculture, with over $11 billion in sales. In
> > addition, consumers have responded favorably to the new organic
> > labeling program.
> >
> >
> >
> > "Iowa has a big stake in this debate. Iowa is the second largest
> > producer of organic corn and soybeans, and an organic feed
> > exemption just takes money directly out of Iowa organic farmer's
> > pockets," said Harkin.
> >
> >
> >
> > The rider would allow animal products to be labeled "organic"
> > even though they are not raised on organically-grown feed as
> > required by organic regulations. Certain poultry producers
> > had previously requested this exemption from USDA last summer,
> > but USDA Secretary Veneman denied the request.
> >
> >
> >
> > Harkin said, "Labeling a chicken as 'organic' even though it
> > was fed non-organic feed is like calling orange-colored sugar
> > water 'Florida orange juice' with the excuse that Florida
> > oranges are too expensive. This provision is simply a blatant fraud
> > upon consumers slapped together in the dead of night."
> >
> > "The willingness of Congress to stand behind the fundamental
> > principles of organic food production is critical to the integrity of
> > the organic seal. Organic agriculture is built upon trust; consumers
> > trust that products carrying the organic seal have been
> > produced and processed in accordance with organic standards."
> >
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > To get off the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
> > [log in to unmask]
> >>
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> To get off the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
> [log in to unmask]
>
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To get off the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]
|