Sounds like a win, win situation for MidAmerican and lose, lose situation for everyone else. This kind of business deal is absurd. Jerry Neff
----- Original Message -----
From: Charles Winterwood <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:08:02 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Fw: Enviroscribe: Iowa Environmental News-Proposed new Nuclear Plant
Enviroscribe: Iowa Environmental News
________________________________
MidAmerican president: Iowans face 10 percent rate increase for nuclear plant
Posted: 17 Mar 2011 02:28 PM PDT
MidAmerican Energy customers would see their power bills rise 10 percent over a
decade to pay for the investor-owned utility’s share of a proposed Iowa nuclear
plant, the firm’s president told lawmakers Thursday.
That doesn’t include what the utility would pay for new generation from wind or
other fuels.
William Fehrman fielded questions from lawmakers about a proposed 1,000 to
1,600 megawatt nuclear plant to be built by MidAmerican and partners at an
unspecified Iowa site. Among the spots under consideration, Fehrman acknowledged
Thursday: the area surrounding Iowa’s only nuclear plant,Duane Arnold Energy
Center in Palo near Cedar Rapids.
Senators on a commerce subcommittee questioned if the nuclear disaster in Japan
should delay work in Iowa. Fehrman said the difference between the modular,
build-in-chunks plant MidAmerican is eyeing and the old technology in Japan is
like the difference between a smart phone and a rotary dial model. He said the
bill is needed to keep nuclear as one of the utility’s options and to attract
investors.
Regarding rates, Fehrman said Iowans will pay more no matter how the utility
decides to address energy needs as the state grows and federal environmental
regulators make burning coal a more expensive proposition.
“There is no doubt that costs are going to go up,” Fehrman said, noting the
utility hasn’t raised rates since 1995. “We need to keep them down as much as
possible.”
Fehrman said the utility would hold down costs by selling excess power from the
plant. He added that most of the rate increase attributed to the plant would
come in the latter part of the decade.
A recent study by the Illinois Commerce Commission listed nuclear as one of the
cheapest power-generation options based on the price per kilowatt hour, Fehrman
said.
The plant, if approved by the Iowa Utilities Board, would come online in late
2020 at the earliest, Fehrman said.
Sen. Swati Dandekar of Marion said Iowans are concerned about paying for a
project that may cost more than the utility thinks, given the nation’s record on
cost overruns at nuclear plants.
“There is no doubt there is a history of cost overruns in this industry,”
Fehrman said. “We’ve asked for more oversight of this project, and that’s in the
bill.”
MidAmerican is pushing legislation that would set some of the rate-making
principles to be applied to the plant, in effect telling investors how the
utility would recover its expenses.
Opposition to the bill continued to mount Thursday. The Iowa Sierra Club, with
its lawyer in tow, delivered 160 letters opposing the legislation to Gov. Terry
Branstad. “At this time of unspeakable tragedy and unimaginable chaos in Japan,
Iowa is still considering promoting nuclear power,” said Pam Mackey-Taylor, who
leads the chapter’s energy efforts. “Nuclear energy is not the answer.”
Only senators were allowed to speak Thursday, but AARP was prepared to speak
against the bill. “AARP believes it is unfair to consumers and bad policy for
the Iowa General Assembly to enact legislation that would allow utility
companies to charge consumers in advance for costs of a new plant before it is
in service, and require consumers to continue to have to pay even if the plant
development is canceled, or goes over budget,” the group representing senior
citizens said in a statement. “AARP is concerned about this legislation, not
because of the question of nuclear power, but because we oppose raising rates
for consumers already struggling to afford their utility bills for a plant yet
to be built, where we don’t know the actual cost to build, and may or may not
even be built in Iowa.”
Fehrman acknowledged that ratepayers would cover expenses for the project even
if it is canceled.
Representatives of the Iowa Environmental Council attended Thursday’s session.
You are subscribed to email updates from Des Moines Register Staff Blogs »
Enviroscribe: Iowa Environmental News
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. Email delivery powered
by Google
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]
Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp
Sign up to receive Sierra Club Insider, the flagship
e-newsletter. Sent out twice a month, it features the Club's
latest news and activities. Subscribe and view recent
editions at http://www.sierraclub.org/insider/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]
Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp
Sign up to receive Sierra Club Insider, the flagship
e-newsletter. Sent out twice a month, it features the Club's
latest news and activities. Subscribe and view recent
editions at http://www.sierraclub.org/insider/
|
