I phoned Rep. Ganske's office today and requested that he sign on to the Lane
Evans letter. No comment from the person who took my call. She did say that
Ganske is not on the House Agriculture Committee, which should mean he was not
one of the 36 signers of the pro-hog lot letter.

Tom Mathews


In a message dated 99-03-04 18:35:53 EST, you write:

<< From: Debbie Neustadt

 Representative Leach is the only representative in Iowa that has been
 listed as a possible co-signer. I have asked Lane Evans office to fax
 Leach's staff person Amy Trotter a copy of the letter. Representative
 Leach's DC phone number is 202-225-6576. Ask for Amy Trotter or just leave
 a message. Calling in his home district would help also.

 The following is from today's Sierra Club Action Daily, in case you missed
it.
 It is vitally important for the federal government to take action against
 large scale hog factories and other concentrated animal feeding operations
 (CAFO's).

 Tom Mathews

 LAST CHANCE TO STRENGTHEN ADMINISTRATION STRATEGY ON ANIMAL FACTORY POLLUTION
  - ASK YOUR REPRESENTATIVE TO SIGN ON TO EVANS LETTER

  Rep. Lane Evans (D-IL-17) is circulating a letter to his House colleagues in
  a last-minute attempt to persuade EPA and USDA to issue a strong strategy to
  control pollution from industrial-style animal factories. With the
  Administration set to release its strategy soon, we urgently need to help
  Evans recruit members of Congress to co-sign this letter, which will be sent
  to EPA Administrator Carol Browner and Agriculture Secretary Dan Glickman.

  The Evans letter is in response to a letter 36 members of the House
  Agriculture Committee sent to Administrator Browner on February 11. That
  letter challenges EPA's legal authority under the Clean Water Act to
regulate
  huge quantities of animal manure that are polluting rivers, killing fish,
  contaminating drinking water, and poisoning the air.  It concludes by
  threatening to haul EPA officials before the Committee for a hostile
hearing.

  The Evans letter (below) can help give the Administration the courage it
  needs to release a stronger plan to control the largest animal factories.
  Its general wording is designed to make it easy for members to sign on.  We
  particularly need Republicans and members from agricultural states.

  The deadline for signing is Wednesday, March 10.  Please call your member of
  Congress today and ask him or her to sign on to this letter.

  For more information, contact Ed Hopkins or Mike Newman.


  March 3, 1999

  Dear Secretary Glickman and Administrator Browner:

  We commend your efforts in creating the USDA/EPA Unified National Strategy
  for Animal Feeding Operations.  Your cooperative approach recognizes the
  importance of livestock, pork, dairy and poultry production to our nation's
  economy while signifying the need to ensure that agricultural production is
  done in harmony with the environment and public health.

  While we believe that the draft strategy is a step in the right direction,
it
  is clear that more must be done to quickly address the social and
  environmental problems resulting from the concentration of the animal
feeding
  industry.  We are pleased that the draft strategy includes requirements for
  large-scale confinement operations to adopt proper manure handling, storage,
  and land application methods to reduce agricultural runoff.  We also support
  your efforts to update and expand the number of operations under the
National
  Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits within the Clean
Water
  Act. However, as you finalize the strategy we urge you to consider the
  following:

  Promote sustainable agriculture:  Although we support the Administration's
  request to increase funds for the Environmental Quality Incentives Program,
  the primary source of USDA assistance for animal feeding operation owners
and
  operators, we are disappointed the draft strategy does little to promote
  sustainable agriculture programs as pollution prevention tools.  We urge
that
  the final strategy give priority attention to directing financial, research,
  and technical assistance to promote sustainable practices.  Economically
  viable, environmentally sound, and socially responsible, sustainable
  practices has helped many farmers and ranchers be better stewards of their
  land through such methods as better soil erosion and nutrient management.

  Strengthen measures that allow for public involvement. While we understand
  that USDA, EPA, and their state partners have limited financial and
personnel
  resources, protecting our nation's water resources and public health should
  not be compromised.  Therefore, we recommend that EPA require individual,
  rather than general permits, which not only allow for site-specific,
tailored
  requirements but also allows citizens to be notified before a large or
  expanding animal feeding operation has been established in their community.
  Individual permits also provide citizens the opportunity to comment on
permit
  and permit-related information before and after they are approved, such as
  the requirements outlined in a facility's comprehensive nutrient management
  plan.

  Focus first on CAFO's.  Because of the increased threat to water and air
  quality posed by the largest animal feeding operations, we urge that efforts
  be focused first on permitting CAFO's before considering smaller operations.

  Fully evaluate the impacts on all resources.  For better accountability and
  to ensure compliance, permittees should be required to monitor the ground
and
  surface water quality surrounding their operations and periodically report
  the results to permit authorities.  We also urge the strategy to focus
beyond
  water quality impacts to air, soil and wildlife concerns.

  We understand the importance of state and federal programs that provide
  voluntary incentives for animal feeding operations to meet environmental and
  health safety standards.  However, inconsistent state regulations have made
  it too easy for large operations to relocate to states with weaker
  regulations. Now is the time for the federal government to not only provide
  conservation guidance but to also strongly and fully implement the Clean
  Water Act to minimize fish kills, well water contamination, public health
and
  air quality problems affecting communities across the nation.

  Once again, we commend your leadership on this crucial issue.  We look
  forward to working with you on finding common-sense solutions and to timely
  implement the Unified Animal Feeding Operations Strategy.


  Sincerely,
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
  ---------------------------------
  >>

-----------------------------------------------------------------
To get off the IOWA-TOPICS list, send email to [log in to unmask]
Make the message text (not the subject): SIGNOFF IOWA-TOPICS