--- begin forwarded text From: "Scotty Johnson" <[log in to unmask]> To: "(Farm Bureau Investigation}" <[log in to unmask]> Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 16:40:19 -0700 Reply-to: [log in to unmask] Hi Folks, I will be sending updates over the next few days on the call for an investigation into the Farm Bureau. Please take a moment and forward this piece, by Al Krebbs, on the farm bureau to all you know. Also, please post this to any chat rooms, list serves you belong to. Kind Regards, Scotty Johnson GREEN Rural Community Outreach Coordinator 520 623 9653 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The AGRIBUSINESS EXAMINER Issue # 70 April 16, 2000 Monitoring Corporate Agribusiness From a Public Interest Perspective A.V. Krebs - Editor\Publisher EDITORS NOTE: The few sustaining the many! That has been pretty much the story in the some 19 months since THE AGRIBUSINESS EXAMINER first began appearing on computer screens. During the course of its existence, a small, but financially loyal group of folks have provided me with most welcome support, but their number is small compared to the near 1000 folks who today receive THE AGRIBUSINESS EXAMINER. In conceiving THE AGRIBUSINESS EXAMINER, this editor wanted to make it as inexpensive to readers as he possibly could; hence, no subscription price, just personally affordable contributions. Thus, donations will, as always, be gladly accepted. Checks made out to A.V. Krebs, P.O. Box 2201, Everett, Washington 98203- 0201 (NOT to the "Agribusiness Examiner") will continue to be received with much gratitude. To those loyal folks who have sent me financial support in the past my sincere thanks for your continued support. COMMENTARY: Investigating the American Farm Bureau To those farmers, consumers and elected representatives who have traditionally entertained the notion that the American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) is "the voice of American agriculture" the recent "60 Minutes" expose of the Farm Bureau's financial affairs may have come as a shock. Likewise to many farmers, weaned on AFBF propaganda, Mike Wallace's report may have appeared as yet one more attack on agriculture by a corporate dominated media, a renewed attempt to portray farmers and farm organizations as more concerned with the bottom line than with feeding people. Unfortunately, the "60 Minutes" piece contributed in some measure to such an impression by making it appear that the Farm Bureau's financial interests and the rewarding of their officers with lucrative financial investments was all of recent origin. Such is not the case, however, for from the days of its very founding the Farm Bureau's bureaucracy has solidly aligned itself with the interests of corporate agribusiness, treating its members not as members, but rather as docile paying customers. Anyone familiar with Dale Kramer's timely The TRUTH About the Farm Bureau, published in the mid-30's and reprinted in 1950, Wesley McCune's well-documented The Farm Bloc, published in 1943, Samuel R. Berger's telling Dollar Harvest: An Expose of the Farm Bureau, published in 1971 and Grant McConnell's thoughtful The Decline of Agrarian Democracy published in 1977 knows that the Farm Bureau has indeed been the "enemy within" agriculture, that it's leadership has paid scant attention to the needs of family farmers while enriching themselves at the expense of those same members. Had "60 Minutes" simply made a passing references to the pioneering work of these authors, in addition to the efforts of the late Rep. Joseph Resnick (Dem-N.Y.) in the late 1960's to expose the Farm Bureau, the viewing public would have soon realized that the Farm Bureau is an 80 year-old scandal in agriculture that not only our elected representatives, but the nation's major farm organizations have refused to confront. In a speech on the House of Representatives floor in 1967 that still resonates today Rep. Resnick charged that the Farm Bureau had done more to prevent the economic and social advancement of rural citizens than any other organization in America. "The Farm Bureau is entitled to its full share of the blame for the fact that our rural areas are burdened with the most poverty, highest unemployment, least social and economic development, and poorest health facilities in the Nation. Their crime has not been mere indifference. Quite the contrary. They have intensively fought every attempt to correct these ills." In brief touching on the fact that the Farm Bureau still opposes the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and calls for the abolishment of the Department of Education, eliminating the Department of Energy, opposes the Equal Rights Amendment, opposes gun control, "60 Minutes" failed to note that much of the AFBF's political activity, as Resnick, his one-time legislative assistant Sandy Berger (yes! the same Sandy Berger that now heads the nation's National Security Agency), Wes McCune and others have found particularly unsettling is the Bureau's close ties with the political far right in the United States. "What might once have been a conservative, business-oriented organization is now considerably more," Resnick declared in his House speech. "By my calculation, the Farm Bureau is the most efficient conduit now in existence for the dissemination of right-wing propaganda. The Bureau is perfect sewer line for transporting right- wing ideology, particularly to our young." It would be unfair to blame the AFBF entirely for the recent spate of fascist, racist, anti-Semitic vigilante farm groups which have sprung up throughout the U.S. in the past 20 years, born in frustration and nurtured by a depressed farm economy. However, the Farm Bureau, through its long-standing role as a visible propaganda agent for right-wing extremism, certainly made itself the spawning ground for much of the misdirected, unsocial and violent behavior that one finds in many of our depressed farm communities. Thus, the time is long overdue for a thorough Congressional investigation of the Farm Bureau and its business practices, its tax- exempt status, its very structure, its hidden motives behind its vigorous efforts to expand the nation's crop insurance program, and in general its political muscle, often exercised not in the name of family farm agriculture, but in the promotion of the interests of its corporate agribusiness brethren. Certainly, Mike Wallace's "60 Minutes" essay was a good start. Now Defenders of the Wildlife is currently spearheading such a national effort to get such an investigation underway and while the campaign has the support of many environmental organizations it still needs the solid backing of many more local and national farm organizations to succeed for such an investigative effort must not be seen as renewed conflict between farmers and environmentalists, but rather as a concerted attempt to bring long overdue economic and social justice to rural America. A Defenders report, Amber Waves of Gain, highlights many areas of Farm Bureau operations and demonstrates that the Farm Bureau is an intricate web of interconnecting business interests, including insurance companies,agribusiness giants and banks, linked with the national federation, the 50 state bureaus, more than 2,800 county bureaus and 4.9 million members, although 1997 Census of Agriculture figures show that there are only 1.9 million farms in the U.S. To obtain a copy of Amber Waves of Gain or a list of the 180-plus groups joining in the call for action, contact Ken Goldman at (202) 682-9400 x237. The report is also available in PDF format at http://www.defenders.org --- end forwarded text -- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Rex L. Bavousett Photographer University of Iowa Our old name: University Relations - Publications Our new name: University Communications & Outreach - Publications 100 OPL, Iowa City, IA 52242 http://www.uiowa.edu/~urpubs/ mailto:[log in to unmask] voice: 319 384-0053 fax: 319 384-0055 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - For SC email list T-and-C, send: GET TERMS-AND-CONDITIONS.CURRENT to [log in to unmask]