From:
http://www.sierraclub.org/policy/conservation/biomass.asp

Sierra Club Conservation Policies

Alternative Transportation Fuels

1.    Federal and state laws and regulations should be strengthened to limit
pollutant emissions from internal-combustion engines to the absolutely
practicable minimum, regardless of the fuel used. States should have the
option of adopting more stringent controls than the federal requirements.

2.    Motor vehicles should be required, through manufacturers' guarantees
and strict enforcement, to meet these emission limits for a certification
lifetime of at least 100,000 miles.

3.    If existing technology cannot reduce the emissions of a pollutant to
acceptable levels, then regulations should set limits that can force
emission reductions through other means.

4.    The Sierra Club does not promote the general, nationwide use of any
specific transportation fuel. Similarly, it does not endorse any legislation
or regulatory action that, by mandated use, subsidy, or preferential
relaxation of emission standards, is intended to favor the general,
nationwide use of a specific fuel.

5.    However, for limited applications where alternative fuels can provide
clearly demonstrable and significant environmental benefits, the Sierra Club
encourages their implementation.

6.    The Sierra Club supports the development and tests of promising
alternative transportation fuels and technologies so that national fuels
policies can be based on demonstrated results.

Adopted by the Board of Directors, November 11-12, 1989.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gasahol (Ethanol)

Recognizing the importance of acting as stewards of our land, the Sierra
Club recommends that any state or federal policy or program promoting the
use of agricultural land to produce alcohol for fuel have safeguards to
ensure that such programs or policies do not cause adverse environmental
impacts on the land or adversely affect the price or supply of food
products. Federal and state subsidies for gasahol from grains should be
replaced by an energy conservation program of comparable magnitude.

More gasoline can be saved by investments to reverse the decline in the
quantity and quality of urban mass transit and intercity railroads, and to
improve auto efficiency. More support for the readily available, economic
means to conserve energy in oil-heated homes will allow more gasoline to be
produced from a given amount of crude oil. These approaches are preferable
to gasohol in terms of the petroleum saved per dollar spent, the capital
investment required, the jobs created, and the effects on soil, air, and
water resources.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To get off the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]