The Bush Administration's Record on the 30th Anniversary of the Clean Water
Act


Thanks to the Clean Water Act, we have made great progress in protecting
America's water.  Today about 60 percent of our streams and 55 percent of
lakes are safe for swimming and fishing, compared to just 30 to 40 percent in
1972.  We've slowed down the rate at which sprawl and development are
gobbling up our wetlands and we've increased the number of communities served
by sewage treatment facilities.

But we have a long way to go to achieve the Clean Water Act's goal of making
all waters in the U.S. safe for swimming and fishing.  Despite the progress
we have made, 218 million Americans live within ten miles of a polluted
waterway.  Pollution from agriculture, sewage treatment facilities, and urban
stormwater continues to threaten our nation's water quality.  Health agencies
warn people to limit their consumption of fish caught in the Great Lakes and
most of our coastal waters.  After more than ten years of a "no-net-loss"
policy, we are still losing 60,000 acres of wetlands each year.  We must
redouble our efforts and build on the Clean Water Act's successes.

The key to progress lies with the American people, who value their right to
clean water.  Unfortunately, the Bush Administration continues to protect
polluting special interests instead of our families and our communities.  In
a variety of ways, the Administration has acted or is making plans to let
polluters and developers off the hook by weakening protections for our waters
and wetlands.  The progress we've made in cleaning up the nation's waters
over the past three decades is in jeopardy.  Some of the Bush
Administration's decisions and initiatives that pose the greatest threat to
our nation's water quality are listed below.

-Making it legal to bury streams with mining and other waste: On May 3, 2002,
the Bush Administration made key changes to a Clean Water Act rule legalizing
the burying of streams with waste from mountaintop removal coal mining.

-Stopping rules to reduce overflows of raw sewage: Since January 2001, the
Bush Administratio has held up a proposed Clinton Administration rule that
would have required municipalities to control releases of raw sewage and warn
health authorities when they occur.

-Approving weak state water quality rules- On November 26, 2001, the Bush
Administration approved water quality rules proposed by West Virginia that
will make it easier to add new pollution to West Virginia waters than in
other states.

-Expediting permits for wetlands destruction: The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers implemented a new Nationwide Permit (NWP) system under the Clean
Water Act on January 15, 2002.  The Corps' new permit system weakens reforms
the Clinton Administration made in 2000, which included restricting wetland
and stream destruction in floodplains and limiting the size of
wetlands-destroying development.

-Abandoning the "no-net-loss" wetlands policy: On October 31, 2001, the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers unilaterally decided to abandon a "no-net-loss"
policy for wetlands.  Under the new policy, replacement of destroyed wetlands
can be achieved through preservation or enhancement of existing wetlands, or
by creating small buffer strips along streams and other waterways.  None of
these types of mitigation can compensate for loss of natural wetlands.

-Threatening to eliminate all federal protection for many streams and
wetlands: On September 19, 2002, Bush Administration officials told a
congressional subcommittee that the Administration would propose new
regulations redefining which waterways are covered by the Clean Water Act.
Based on this testimony, periodically dry streams found in the upper reaches
of headwaters, non-navigable tributaries, and wetlands adjacent to tributary
streams might lose protection that the Clean Water Act currently provides.

-Delaying the cleanup of dirty waters: The EPA is designing weaker rules to
implement the Clean Water Act's Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) program.  The
EPA's new proposal attempts to weaken the federal government's mandate to
issue cleanup plans when states fail to do so; allows increased discharges
from factories and sewage treatment plants based on speculative and
unenforceable reductions in runoff pollution; and creates new ways for states
to take waterbodies off the cleanup list without reducing pollution.

-Stalling water quality standards for nitrogen and phosphorus: In June 1998,
the EPA announced a national strategy to establish standards for nitrogen and
phosphorus.  With the EPA's assistance, the strategy called for states to
develop water quality standards for these pollutants by the end of 2004.
Despite the importance of controlling nitrogen and phosphorus pollution, it
seems highly unlikely that the Bush Administration will adhere to the
timeline established in 1998.

-Promoting a new program for water pollution trading: The EPA released a
proposal on April 25, 2002, calling for the creation of a pollution crediting
system in each state.  This voluntary initiative, which is not permitted
under the Clean Water Act, would allow some polluters to discharge more waste
by purchasing credits from other polluters who discharge less than their
legal limit.

Erin E. Jordahl
Director, Iowa Chapter Sierra Club
3839 Merle Hay Road, Suite 280
Des Moines, IA 50310
515-277-8868
[log in to unmask]
[log in to unmask]