FYI

Visit www.SaveTheMissouri.org to help the Missouri River!

Chad Smith, Director
Nebraska Field Office - American Rivers
Mill Towne Building
650 J Street, Suite 400
Lincoln, Nebraska 68508
402-477-7910
402-477-2565 (FAX)
402-730-5593 (CELLULAR)
[log in to unmask]

-----Original Message-----
From:     Eric Eckl [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent:    Thursday, November 07, 2002 3:26 PM
To:    Eric Eckl
Subject:    News: Missouri River status quo violates three federal laws,
groups
charge

American Rivers
Izaak Walton League of America
National Wildlife Federation
North Dakota Wildlife Federation
South Dakota Wildlife Federation
Nebraska Wildlife Federation
Iowa Wildlife Federation
Kansas Wildlife Federation

Eric Eckl, American Rivers, (202) 347-7550 ext. 3023
Linda Shotwell, National Wildlife Federation, (703) 438-6083
Jeff Fleming, Izaak Walton League, (301) 548-0150 ext. 215

For Immediate Release
November 7, 2002

Missouri River status quo violates three federal laws, groups charge

Letter to Bush Administration officials reasserts intent to file
lawsuit, full text available at www.americanrivers.org

On the eve of the bicentennial of the Lewis and Clark expedition, court
action is necessary to save the river that carried the explorers to the
continental divide, according to a coalition of conservation organizations.

In a letter to Interior Secretary Gale Norton and Army Secretary Thomas
White, the organizations served notice today that they will file suit to
secure new operations for six U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dams that are
causing the Missouri Rivers' continued ecological decline and imposing
economic hardships on some riverfront communities-in violation of the
Endangered Species Act, the Flood Control Act of 1942, and the
Administrative Procedures Act.

Today's letter was signed by former Deputy Interior Secretary David Hayes,
and supplements and updates a notice of intent first filed by American
Rivers on March 30, 2000. Hayes will represent the plaintiff organizations
American Rivers, the Izaak Walton League of America, the National Wildlife
Federation, the South Dakota Wildlife Federation, the Nebraska Wildlife
Federation, and the Iowa Wildlife Federation.

"The Army Corps is clinging to the status quo in defiance of the law, clear
science, and sound economics," said Hayes, now a partner at the Washington,
DC office of the law firm Latham & Watkins.

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers currently releases water from its dams on a
schedule intended to maximize the length of the commercial shipping season
for a tiny barge industry on the lower third of the river. These unnatural
flows have driven three species - the pallid sturgeon, piping plover, and
interior least tern - to the brink of extinction. The region also forgoes
the economic activity associated with "nearly one million recreation-based
days of hunting, fishing, sightseeing and boating annually," according to
one Army Corps study.

According to a "biological opinion" issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service in November 2000, the Army Corps was required to modify operations
beginning in the spring of 2003 to recreate more natural seasonal water
levels. Despite this, the Army Corps recently secured an unwarranted
extension to this deadline from the Bush Administration. The conservation
organizations contend that this action violates the Endangered Species Act.

"It's unfortunate that when the Lewis and Clark bicentennial kicks off next
January at Monticello, the fate of the river will be in the hands of judges
because of an astounding lack of leadership on the part of the Corps of
Engineers," said Rebecca R. Wodder, president of American Rivers.

The plaintiffs also charge that the Army Corps violates the Flood Control
Act of 1942 by prioritizing the barge industry, worth at best $7 million
annually, over the recreation industry, worth at least $90 annually. That
law stipulates that "to the extent that the several functions of water
control and utilization are conflicting, preference should be given to those
which make the greatest contribution to the well-being of the people and to
the areas of greatest need."

"Sportsmen believed the Administration when they said would make
decisions like this based on science.  We are disappointed that they
have not yet done so," said Paul W. Hansen, executive director of the
Izaak Walton League of America. "The National Academy of Sciences
concluded that these changes in flow would 'enhance the valuable fishery
resources...increase waterfowl populations... increase the abundance of
largemouth bass...attract more anglers to the region...provide enhanced
recreational and aesthetic opportunities for both anglers and
hunters...result in marked increases in user-days for recreational
fishing, commercial fishing, and hunting.'"

The current operations guidance for the Missouri River was banged out on
manual typewriters more than 40 years ago, and the ecological, economic, and
social conditions along the river have changed dramatically since then. The
Army Corps has stalled development of modern dam operations schedule for
over a decade, leading the plaintiffs to charge that the agency is violating
the prohibition against "unreasonable delay" in the Administrative
Procedures Act.

"While the Administration recognizes that the Missouri River is an important
part of America's history, it is doing nothing to ensure it is part of its
future," said Chris Hesla, executive director of the South Dakota Wildlife
Federation.  "Without leadership from the White House, we must use every
option available to protect this treasured river, including litigation."



Erin E. Jordahl
Director, Iowa Chapter Sierra Club
3839 Merle Hay Road, Suite 280
Des Moines, IA 50310
515-277-8868
[log in to unmask]
[log in to unmask]