**Your Calls are Needed to Stop the Bush Logging Plan! Please call our Senators Harkin and Grassley as soon as possible Wednesday at (202) 224-3121 and urge them to oppose the Healthy Forest Initiative.** TALKING POINTS The message is simple. Just tell the staff person you speak with that you are calling to urge the senator to vote to *oppose* the Healthy Forest Initiative and FOR the Leahy, Boxer, Bingaman and Cantwell amendments to H.R.1904. As early as Wednesday the Senate could vote on a slightly altered version of the Bush Administration's ill-named Healthy Forests Initiative. The Cochran-Wyden-Feinstein deal does little to improve upon the original version of the Healthy Forests Initiative, also know as HR 1904, and still fundamentally fails to require agencies to prioritize protection of homes and communities in a way that we believe is critical to ensure protection of at-risk communities. In fact, the bill will allow federal agencies to spend up to half of the funds authorized in the bill on *projects located far away* from at-risk communities. Moreover, the bad compromise deal supported by Senators Cochran, Wyden, and Feinstein still seeks to interfere with the independent judiciary, cut the heart out of the National Environmental Policy Act, and undermine the public's legal rights to meaningfully participate in decisions affecting our public lands. We are concerned that the measure will open the forests to new logging yet do little to protect the thousands of Americans whose homes and communities stand next to forests. Several U.S. Senators have promised to offer amendments to ease some of its worst provisions and to provide real help to protect citizens against forest fire. We must tell you that odds are tough for these amendments, but there's a chance we might prevail if we can reach enough members of the Senate. That's where we need your help. Please take a moment today to contact our U.S. Senators. Like every other American, you have doubtless seen images of the terrible brush fires sweeping through Southern California. They've been frightening, destructive and deadly. The impulse to help is strong and human and worthy. Less worthy, though, is the insistence of some members of Congress to use this tragedy to ram a bad fire bill through Congress. They claim the legislation would have prevented the Southern California fires. We know, and they know, that it would have done no such thing. The fires are burning not just on federal land but on private land. And they are burning in vegetation (chaparral) that would never be thinned and would probably not be subjected to prescribed burns, either. In sum, these are not public land forest fires. There are four amendments in particular that can greatly improve the legislation now before the Senate (good amendments): --Sen. Patrick Leahy's (D-VT) amendment to strike the bill's provisions that interfere with our established national system of judicial review; those provisions are unwarranted and unwise. --Sen. Barbara Boxer's (D-CA) amendment to direct that 70 percent of the money the bill authorizes must be spent where it can truly help: within a half-mile of communities and within roughly 130 feet of homes. --Sen. Jeff Bingaman's (D-NM) amendment to appropriate $100 million per year to fund fuels reduction projects on the non-federal land that makes up nearly 85 percent of places where our homes meet the trees, the "wildland-urban interface" as it is called. --Sen. Maria Cantwell's (D-WA) amendment to strike from the bill the provisions that cut the heart out of NEPA. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp