From the Wilderness Society tonight:

Statement on the House-Senate Compromise, Energy Legislation
William H. Meadows, President, The Wilderness Society

At a press conference this morning, Senator Pete Domenici (R,
NM) confirmed that House and Senate negotiators have decided to
abandon attempts to include drilling in the Arctic National
Wildlife Refuge in the final Energy Bill conference report.

If that's true, Americans can breathe a sigh of relief; the
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge has dodged yet another bullet.
The fact is that Arctic Refuge drilling should never have been
in the crosshairs in the first place. When House/Senate
conferees agreed today to drop a provision authorizing drilling
in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, they finally saw the
writing on the wall: the American public wants wildlife - not
oil companies- to roam free in its wildlife refuges.

Nevertheless, it would be a terrible mistake to think that
taking Arctic drilling out of the bill somehow makes this energy
bill worth voting for. A Zogby International poll released this
week found that 55 percent of Americans agree. They think it
would be better if this bill didn't pass Congress, and the vast
majority want more efficient cars and more renewable energy like
wind and solar, not the drilling incentives and corporate tax
breaks in the bill.

The remainder of the bill being considered by the energy
conference committee still contains provisions that would
effectively make oil drilling the dominant activity on millions
of acres of public lands and coastlines. From the Otero Mesa in
New Mexico to the Rocky Mountain Front in Montana to the most
ecologically and culturally sensitive places in the National
Petroleum Reserve-Alaska, this bill hands over public treasures
for private profit, while scrapping or delaying long-standing
protections for clean air, clean water, and public health.

Poll after poll has shown that the American people believe some
places are so wild, so special, and so important that they
should be off limits to oil drilling. There can be no doubt that
the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is one of those places.
Drilling in the Arctic would have ruined an irreplaceable
natural treasure forever, for just a few months' worth of oil a
decade from now. It is gratifying that the energy conferees have
once more seen the light and dropped their ill-conceived attempt
to drill one of America's last, wildest places.

Even though drilling there would do nothing to address America's
energy needs, it's a given that drilling boosters will try again
to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge sooner or later. We
will be watching their every move, and we will be ready to stop
them again.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To get off the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]